Oh my droogy droogs. What tales I have to tell of places far away and creatures that defy description.
That would be fun writing about
Second Life like that. But I'm frankly incapable. In fact, I defy anyone to describe the place in terms other than their personal experience. Intrigued by
jigsawpig's comments, I signed up on a trial basis the other
(
Read more... )
Comments 4
In my experience, the world seems to be divided into people who 'get' VR, and people who don't. I'm not sure from where in people's psyche, experience or world-view this distinction derives, but I suspect it has a lot to do with whether or not they have actually reached a sufficient degree of accommodation with their real-world lives to give them a stable base from which to explore other perspectives.
I myself see it as a wonderful privilege to have been given the opportunity not only to get a glimpse into the inevitable 'augmented-reality' future, but also, in a limited way, to experience it.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Actually, despite your using up four months' quota of long words on me, I can see what you're saying. I'm a little riddled by the idea that my reality is essentially false (smells like religion) but what you are saying about the limited capability of our sensors makes a lot of sense. Especially as we commonly use various equipments to extend our own sensory range a little further.. who is to say what the limit is and what we'll see?
Here I must confess that whilst in SL, I find it faintly ridiculous to be reacting with a bunch of animated pixels. I even found myself, quite involuntarily, expressing pleasure at a virtual hug!
Similarly, why am I shy at initiating a conversation with a beautiful avatar? This bears investigation. For the moment, much more compelling than figuring out how to build a house...
Reply
Leave a comment