Letter to FSF on Red Hat GPL compliance:

Jun 11, 2003 15:51

(Followup: the total of my correspondence with the FSF can be seen
here. The FSF continually demonstrates that they aren't even familiar with the Red Hat EULA, and finally RMS gives me a brushoff because he lacks the energy to read the license.
Today I sent a letter to the FSF asking for their opinion on an apparant discrepancy I've noticed in the ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

think before you write anonymous June 12 2003, 05:30:31 UTC
from slashdot today:

Red Hat License Challenged

Posted by michael on Thursday June 12, @08:20AM

from the challenge-is-good dept.
An anonymous reader writes: "David McNett has noticed an apparent discrepancy between the Red Hat Linux EULA and the GPL. He has written an open letter to the FSF asking for their opinion on the matter. Does Red Hat have the right to "audit your facilities and records" to ensure compliance with their license?" McNett misreads the Red Hat documents. Their contract is for the various services, not the software, and for the services they are entitled to demand whatever concessions they think the market will bear.

Reply

Re: think before you write anonymous June 12 2003, 08:42:38 UTC
they license support, not the software (the GPL software ( ... )

Reply

Re: think before you write anonymous June 12 2003, 16:52:51 UTC
The binary ISO's from what I recall have binary images that are not covered under a redistributable arrangement, so in order to redistribute them Redhat AS CD's, you would have to remove the Images and replace them with something else.

Reply

Re: think before you write anonymous June 12 2003, 19:52:27 UTC
>so how can they audit "support"?

The support and services are per machine.

>supposedly one would violate their EULA if he installs the software on >1 server and then asks RH for support for all these servers.
>but how can RH prove someone has done that?

If unregistered/unsupported machines use Red Hat Network, they can tell. Tech support personnel can also often easily tell if someone calls with very certain issues and call back with other seemingly unrelatable issues, or hardware that is obviously not the same as the entitled machines. But, it's hard in either case to prove.

>they come to your server room and then what?

Probably just cancel all support and network entitlements.

Reply

Re: think before you write anonymous June 12 2003, 21:19:05 UTC
>>so how can they audit "support ( ... )

Reply


Leave a comment

Up