I've been reading the comments sections of various news sources. Lucidity and reasonableness vary from place to place, of course, but the breakdown on CNN and ABC seems to be:
- A large number of reasonably lucid people blaming right wing rhetoric;
- A small number of not very lucid people blaming right wing rhetoric;
- A small number of reasonably lucid people saying they could have guessed that the Right would be blamed for this;
- A small number, sounding rather Nixon-era, describing the shooter as a liberal hippie pothead flag-burner;
- A small number of people saying that if you're part of a fascist government, you bring this sort of thing on yourself.
- A large number of very shocked people saying that surely all that matters is that 18 innocent people were shot;
- A small number saying that we just don't have enough facts yet to draw any conclusions;
- A small number saying that, whatever political motivations the shooter might or might not have had, what little public evidence there is suggests that he was mentally ill.
Plus a few tiny fractions running around being randomly offensive in ways they consider funny.
I also saw an interesting comment on the Guardian site; you can find the original
here:
If that's the guy's website he sounds more like an echo, tanslated [sic] through teen culture, of William Jennings Bryan.
Strange stuff.
Just for chewing, he's the right age for onset of schizophrenia.