Leave a comment

Hmmm.... dakiwiboid May 20 2008, 15:12:27 UTC
On the one hand, Ishtar, as a syncretic goddess, has most of the bases I need covered taken care of. On the other hand, the Eater of Socks clearly exists, and must be propitiated.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

Re: Hmmm.... wilhelmina_d May 20 2008, 15:32:40 UTC
He lives in all our laundry machines. *le sigh*

Reply

Re: Hmmm.... smarriveurr May 20 2008, 15:51:45 UTC
He is omnipresent and indwelling throughout the dryers and washing machines of all creation, for ever and ever - awwww man!

Reply

Re: Hmmm.... witchofnovember May 20 2008, 22:04:36 UTC
He has a horse in my dog, Bailey Killsocks, the dread pirate of things left on the floor.

Reply

Re: Hmmm.... hazelwitch May 22 2008, 03:25:32 UTC
"Laundry: The Other L-Space"

Reply

Re: Hmmm.... ragnvaeig May 20 2008, 15:34:21 UTC
Was having most of the necessary bases covered a factor in your choice of Ishtar?

Reply

Not really dakiwiboid May 20 2008, 15:44:41 UTC
I'm rather an eccentric case, actually. I began feeling connected to Ishtar as a child, well over 40 years ago, and I've always felt that I was chosen, rather than the other way around.

Reply

Re: Not really ragnvaeig May 20 2008, 15:47:26 UTC
Ah, okay. I don't have that kind of relationship to deity, which is why I asked.

Would you consider it a perk, then?

Reply

Re: Not really dakiwiboid May 20 2008, 15:54:36 UTC
Yes, actually. I went to an amazingly great liquor store over the weekend, with such a fabulous selection of beers that it moved me to reverence. I invoked Ishtar-Siduri, goddess of barley beer, on the spot!

Reply

Re: Not really ragnvaeig May 20 2008, 16:04:27 UTC
Oh, win!

Reply

Re: Not really misslynx May 20 2008, 18:26:15 UTC
Er... I assume you're using the word "invoked" in the pop-culture sense of simply calling on a deity, rather than in the literal sense of embodying the deity via possession trance?

Although that would have been a really interesting experience for the other people in the store, I'm sure... :-)

Reply

Sorry dakiwiboid May 20 2008, 18:31:29 UTC
Sloppy language really is unforgiveable. What I really did was to utter several heart-felt, spontaneous prayers, in response to which I felt the presence of Ishtar in Her aspect as Ishtar-Siduri.

Reply

Re: Hmmm.... brock_tn May 20 2008, 16:21:06 UTC
Is the Eater of Socks really a divine being, or is he/it more of an elemental force?

And there's an uncertainty principle about socks anyway: no one is ever able to state with certainty the number of socks they possess.

Reply

Re: Hmmm.... simianlovedoc May 20 2008, 16:48:38 UTC
Is that the Hanes Uncertainty Principle?

Reply

Re: Hmmm.... brock_tn May 20 2008, 17:17:48 UTC
I suspect that the phenomenon is rather older than the Hanes people. Perhaps we could call it the Indeterminate Hosiery Principle?

Reply


Leave a comment

Up