iphone 3G - S (ucks) - Cont.
Just for the record - I don't blindly hate Apple. In fact, quite the opposite. I am in awe of them. Apple continually screws its core customer base and yet they beg for more. They have so successfully marketed a superiority complex (overpay for our products or you'll be like that geeky PC guy in our commercials) that what I consider to be otherwise
( Read more... )
My powerbook pro was upgraded automatically by our IT group - and they put Office 2008, replacing Office 2004. This is the first time I've seen that backwards computability has not been supported. But it wasn't far earlier versions of the product - it was the most recent. All the work that I'd done in 2004 was not available to me in 2008. Mac's suggestion? Get the 2004 version of office, save everything down to an earlier level, and then it would be compatible with 2008.
Unacceptable. It's one thing not to have backwards compatibility with much earlier versions of the software, but the most recent?
They also got rid of macro support, which was something that I found very useful, as VBA is a breeze and it's cleaner/easier to embed some scientific transforms (that don't have too many sig fig issues) in VBA than to use many columns of manipulations.
I guess I don't know if it was microsoft or mac that as more responsible, but either way, wtf?
Reply
Does Office 2008 for Mac not have a compatability mode? In Word 2007 for PC, there is a compatability mode that allows it to open .doc files without a problem.
If it's any consolation, the macro support in Word 2007 for PC is somewhat of a mess as well. It's the one spot where I've seen that stuff written for older versions doesn't work quite right. I understood some of those changes to be for the sake of security though.
Reply
Reply
But it's just, I can't imagine microsoft pulling that stunt on a PC.
To get back to the original post, why is the mac user tolerant of this?
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment