Hello, Shipper Nation, and welcome to this week's DPP!
Today's question is one that I suspect very few of us (self included) like to think about too often, or at all: what if there were no pilots?BSG is a big show, with a massive cast to match. Our pilots, much as we love them and important as they were, were just two of those, and their story
(
Read more... )
Comments 60
Reply
Alternatively, the emotional quotient they bring with their various personalities would have been important. A by-the-book type (on the surface at least) who can do things like force Bill and Laura to have elections and be a liasion between govt. and military was important. And having a wild card in your show, someone who can be the catalyst for unexpected actions and stories is also important (I made a post about this at KaraThraceLives a few weeks ago actually after a TV critic online pointed out how important a rule-bucker--and specifically a Starbuck--is to a drama like BSG.) Without Starbuck, there'd be no Apollo, no arrow, no Kobol/path to Earth, no Helo/Sharon, no Resistance if she hadn't followed her instincts to go against orders on various occasions ( ... )
Reply
So true, especially for a show as dark as BSG. And sure, their roles would have probably been filled, but I don't know whether the characters filling those roles would have connected to each other the way pilots did. (edit: I very much doubt it)
In theory, of course, we could have a show without Lee and Kara, but the reality wouldn't have been as compelling.
Reply
Because if think that it's a big difference.
I'll assume for the moment that you speak about them as a couple because that's easier to answer.
They bright a lot to the story because they are different from what we are used to expect (or at least what people expected at the time of the mini) from couples on TV. The whole gender issue that it's not an issue in BSG and the fact that beyond their history/chemistry, etc they need to have a very close work relation it's very important. Because it's one thing to have multilayered characters and another to have a multilayered relationship on top of it.
Now, if you ask me if I would have watched BSG without them - yes, I would have. But, I would not be on the internets speaking/debating/.... about the show. It would have been just another show that I watched and I would have moved on to the next.
what do you think pilots brought to the show, and the story, that made them - and the show, ( ... )
Reply
I agree with every word you say here, though. It is all truth.
Reply
The show needed a CAG and a Top Gun. And for the plot to go as it did they needed somebody to go to Caprica and then somebody to split the Fleet and so on. And every show needs somebody who follows the rules and somebody that doesn't.
But we can argue the idea of not having them at all. then if we take them out of the equation as a package of sorts, like not only their persons but their actions we would have a scenario in which - no Apollo, no Fleet. No Kara, no Galactica. And that's just the mini.
as a side note - I think I saw too many episodes of different shows based on the butterfly effect. so, maybe you should just disregard my scenario.
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
lol, me too. That was so much babble, and I'm much like you in that I don't give a frak about any of the Cylons (with the exception of the Sixes and Eights) - the deviations to go into Cylon culture and baseship babble were pretty much where I started thinking "ok, enough now, these guys are boring and can we go back to the humans please? Especially angsty adulterous pilots?". (Chief, Tigh etc counted as humans for most of the show's run)
Reply
OMG. I did it, too. LOL.
Reply
Reply
Reply
THIS. So much of this.
Reply
Reply
So, YES, I make the same distinction. there is liking of a couple, and rooting for them and there is SHIPPING THE PILOTS.
Reply
Leave a comment