A analysis of brownie division algorithims

Apr 17, 2007 14:53

Or "What to say when your kid asks why they need to learn algebra"

The other day geekchick and I had a pan of brownies. She prefers edge pieces and I prefer middle pieces, but after cutting it up in a fairly typical way, (3x6 or so) I realized there were a lot more edge pieces (14 out of 18 for 3x6). Driven by my love of math and chocolate, I set out to ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 30

boadiccea April 17 2007, 19:22:24 UTC
Ow! Heady hurty with the maths.

I'd just eat the damn brownie already. Don't care which kind. ;)

Reply

geekchick April 17 2007, 19:24:01 UTC
You should've heard the complaining when I cut into the brownies without having done the appropriate math first! ;)

Reply

boadiccea April 17 2007, 19:30:07 UTC
LOL!

Reply

brian1789 April 17 2007, 20:17:53 UTC
It was all my fault! Although it made for a yummy breakfast, this morning.

Reply


geekchick April 17 2007, 19:22:42 UTC
My calculations imply that the number of brownie middle pieces available at this moment either equals or is rapidly approaching zero, is that correct? ;)

Reply

nminusone April 17 2007, 19:55:50 UTC
It reached zero last night. I ate an edge piece or 2, then in desperation sliced an edge piece lengthwise to make a new middle piece. Unfortunately this made a long, skinny middle piece, which is by definition brownie abomination. So I had to eat it, and never speak of it again.

And then I had a dream about waiting in line for like 2 hours to buy some brownies. Once I finally got near the head of the line the guy in front of me somehow got me to shove like a quarter pan of brownies into my mouth at once. I wath tafkin life thiff!

Reply

brian1789 April 17 2007, 20:19:44 UTC
Forgot to ask... does Gateway eat brownies, and does he prefer edges or middles? That might affect the optimal balance numbers.

Reply

geekchick April 17 2007, 20:35:54 UTC
He doesn't get chocolate. Even if I wanted to give it to him, he seems uninterested in brownies once he gives it the obligatory sniff.

Reply


geminigirl April 17 2007, 21:34:56 UTC
Round. aquariumgirl's husband, after hearing about my feeling on brownies (I'm with you on the middle thing, no crusty edges for me) has come up with a way to make "edgeless brownies" which satisfy the desire for all soft, squishy edges.

Reply

nminusone April 17 2007, 21:47:33 UTC
I've gotta see that, do you have a link?

I was thinking that people who like edge pieces are in luck. They could make a brownie pan based on the Hilbert Curve, which would give them lots more edge pieces.

Reply

geekchick April 17 2007, 21:59:54 UTC
geminigirl April 17 2007, 22:09:57 UTC
I don't have a link, but I know it involves a round cake pan and Magic Cake Strips.

Reply


dcseain April 19 2007, 18:58:19 UTC
Fair enough, but one could just as easily trim some centre from edge bits, no? I, as an edge-preferer, would be fine with that.

Reply

nminusone April 19 2007, 19:47:47 UTC
I'm not sure if it's what you have in mind, but I briefly mentioned one approach that sounds like it might be:

... cut a rectangle in the middle which is sqrt(2)*X by sqrt(2)*Y units. This works, but makes it harder (impossible?) to get equally-sized pieces.

Is that basically the same thing?

Reply

dcseain April 19 2007, 19:53:42 UTC
Similar, i was envisioning squares surrounded by rectangles. Some would argue that would be sacrilige, as the double rectangles around the edge, ignoring corners, would be shaped wrong for some who believe all must be equal. Basically, halve the side edge bits from the 1st round of cutting.

Reply

nminusone April 19 2007, 20:07:57 UTC
Ah ok. In my post I specified a preference (not requirement) for all equal sized pieces, but that was mainly to make the math more fun. I don't personally care that much, since I'm very likely to sub-slice pieces depending on how hungry I am at the moment.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up