For prevention of cruelty to reprobates.
Current Members
ninedaysaqueensmallsotonginkasrainan_english_girldannybaileyfilkferengimikkaybearagh_4frosted_feather *rings gong*
I call to order the first meeting of the Jamey Dodger Society, a group for those who have read a "Thick as Thieves" arc or want to become as spoiled as Varuca Salt.
(
Read more... )
Reply
That was such a perfect scene. I can tell Kamet really respects Irene, and she was being really sweet too. Such a melancholy scene. One of my favorites in the book.
I do have a working theory that maybe the baby didn't die and was sent away. Everything is from Kamet's POV and thus has to be taken with a grain of salt. He's not nearly as clueless as poor Costis though.
Reply
You have confused me, NDQ!
Reply
Reply
Reply
It would be a sensible political move, as their heir would be safe from danger. Also a sensible parental move as their child would be safe from danger.
Reply
Reply
I could only see them sending a healthy child away if the concerns of short term safty outweighed the long term complications. I mostly thought it was wishful thinking, but the Gitta Kingsdaughter detail on the map has me thinking, esspecially after the confirmation that the baby was a girl!
We shall see! Maybe, they will have another daughter.
Reply
Greedy, aren't we?
'When she comes again' made me wonder which of the gods in the Eddisian pantheon brings babies? Moira? The one who spoke to Gen at the end of QoA?
Reply
Right now, this is in the realm of wild speculation and circumstantial interpretation, but you never know!
Reply
So, now, Kamet describing both Gen AND Irene as being in fragile health threw me off balance a little. (Irene? Fragile? Since when?!)
I'm honestly not sure what to make of it all. You'd think there'd be more alarm among Gen and Irene's intimate acquaintances and less talk of Gen being at the forefront of a long and glorious reign (resulting in a "golden age") if everyone knew and/or could see both Gen and Irene were at risk of keeling over off their thrones!
Reply
To me, the whole thing hinges on on the "We will welcome her when she comes again" line, as has already been mentioned here and in the other discussion. Not only because Irene has no reason to believe in reincarnation, seeing that a) we've seen zero mention or implication that reincarnation is a facet of Attolian religion, and b) Irene is famously NOT devout when it comes to the gods, but also because even people who DID believe in reincarnation would not believe that a miscarried baby would later be reincarnated into the same family as her own sisterSo how else could Irene possibly recognize her lost baby, let alone welcome her when she comes again, unless her coming again is in the most literal and not-at-all mystical sense? It might not be a safe time for the baby to be with Gen and ( ... )
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment