Back to court I go
Didn't have to file a contestment on the ruling. Kristen did it for me.
And she did it her way. Not the right way.
For the ten or twelve things that were brought up in court. I had three things change in my favor. One less than what I was asking, and one a lot more.
She is contesting all three. And to add to the ignorance, she is asking for added rulings that weren't brought up on both her response or at the hearing.
That shouldn't even be brought up at the hearing. If she looks for a ruling on that, I'll ask the judge to have her file a modification request just like I did and wait for her day in court.
Anyways, here we go on the skinny.
She has the gall to point out that I didn't have any issues with cutting back my time with Bull until I found out she started dating. She failed to mention that the time was cut back at the exact same time she started dating. And that an average of four weekends more a year is too much between Bull and me.
She even went as far as saying it was cutting back the time between Casper and Bull. And the courts could give two shits about their relationship.
She is arguing that talking to me three times a week is excessive and it will cost her money for the time. She failed to mention that she has a house phone that she refuses to give me the number to. She also failed to mention that I would initiate the conversations to save her the long distance fees.
She is also contesting the idea of me picking him up to start visitation, and her to pick him up to end it. I guess she fails to realize that the distance issue is because she chose to move further, not because she was forced to move further.
She has the gall to bring up, once again, the fact that Eddie and I smoke. Never mind that it was pointed out at the last hearing that the condo is smoke free, or the fact she has never even peered in the door or window and watched us smoke.
She is also asking for the courts to force me to move. On top of that, she is asking them to not allow overnight stays based on her opinions of how I live. Which I will agree to in court, if she will pick him up at 6 PM on Saturday nights and drop him off Sunday mornings at 9 AM.
She is still trying to use the "breat feeding" bit in the paperwork. Which I can never get enough of since he was on the bottle by the time she told me to get out the first time.
When I get my court date assigned, I am inviting anyone and everyone that would like to be a part of this legal trouncing. I figure if her mom can sit in for the last one, why not bring along anyone that cares about me, my son, and the relationship we have together.
And she did it her way. Not the right way.
For the ten or twelve things that were brought up in court. I had three things change in my favor. One less than what I was asking, and one a lot more.
She is contesting all three. And to add to the ignorance, she is asking for added rulings that weren't brought up on both her response or at the hearing.
That shouldn't even be brought up at the hearing. If she looks for a ruling on that, I'll ask the judge to have her file a modification request just like I did and wait for her day in court.
Anyways, here we go on the skinny.
She has the gall to point out that I didn't have any issues with cutting back my time with Bull until I found out she started dating. She failed to mention that the time was cut back at the exact same time she started dating. And that an average of four weekends more a year is too much between Bull and me.
She even went as far as saying it was cutting back the time between Casper and Bull. And the courts could give two shits about their relationship.
She is arguing that talking to me three times a week is excessive and it will cost her money for the time. She failed to mention that she has a house phone that she refuses to give me the number to. She also failed to mention that I would initiate the conversations to save her the long distance fees.
She is also contesting the idea of me picking him up to start visitation, and her to pick him up to end it. I guess she fails to realize that the distance issue is because she chose to move further, not because she was forced to move further.
She has the gall to bring up, once again, the fact that Eddie and I smoke. Never mind that it was pointed out at the last hearing that the condo is smoke free, or the fact she has never even peered in the door or window and watched us smoke.
She is also asking for the courts to force me to move. On top of that, she is asking them to not allow overnight stays based on her opinions of how I live. Which I will agree to in court, if she will pick him up at 6 PM on Saturday nights and drop him off Sunday mornings at 9 AM.
She is still trying to use the "breat feeding" bit in the paperwork. Which I can never get enough of since he was on the bottle by the time she told me to get out the first time.
When I get my court date assigned, I am inviting anyone and everyone that would like to be a part of this legal trouncing. I figure if her mom can sit in for the last one, why not bring along anyone that cares about me, my son, and the relationship we have together.