1) It has warmed up again and gotten very humid, so I've had to close the windows and turn on the a/c. Bah, humbug.
2) ALMOST finished with Bone Clocks, and ... I'm not quite sure what to think of it. So far I like 90% of it and am rolling my eyes at the other 10%, and I think that might hold for the rest of the book. All I'll say right now
(
Read more... )
Comments 7
I did see 'Savings Mr. Banks' recently but I had read the real story of PL Travers first and so it kind of felt fake. I did think that Tom Hanks and Emma Thompson did a good job though with their parts, but Paul Giamatti was a typical Disney-fied role. Just my two cents. ;)
Reply
... I hope that didn't come out as confused as it sounded. :D
As you can imagine, I loved the current of magical realism that ran through the whole film. The ghost, the puppets, Uncle Isak's family -- they're all just amazing. The whole thing is like a dream-memory.
Emma Thompson was terrific! And I liked Tom Hanks, and I think I was just more surprised at Paul Giamatti than anything else. Disney-fied is right!
Reply
Reply
:D
My subconscious, let me show you it. ;-)
Reply
After 28 years of this, I can usually pummel him into wakefulness without fully waking up myself. It's like midnight multi-tasking. :D
Reply
Reply
Seriously, my Uncomfortable Revelation was that if P.L. Travers had been a guy -- a gruff, acid-tongued, snarly guy who put everyone in their place and didn't care what people thought (and where have we seen that before, ha) -- I probably would have liked him.
BUT. They also showed us her childhood, and I didn't particularly care for her as a child, either, and I didn't care for her father. So maybe I wouldn't have liked a male P.L. Travers if they'd shown us HIM as a child? IDK. I am probably overthinking all of this. *g*
Reply
Leave a comment