Threadjacking to mention something a bit more important....anti_aolMarch 8 2010, 03:55:52 UTC
The important part nobody is talking about (without it this story might not seem to be as big a deal): LJ invading our journals without our knowledge or permission to rewrite our links breaks the terms of their own TOS, which clearly states, in part
( ... )
Why did you put the script up for once? And how do you think to answer to those users who lost their fees? The month before you changed the code I gained 36 dollars in referrals fees from Amazon, the month before that 35 dollars. This last month? with you "code" active? 6 dollars... If the count is good, you gained more or less 30 dollars that were rightly mine. Elisa Rolle
And BTW, can you also tell me why, when I opened a support request, one of your tech told me I had a spyware problem? I was very clear in my request, there was all the issue on the outboundlink explained, it was impossible to think that it was a spyware problem... did you have something to hide? or did you want to have time to gain more of my referrals fees? Elisa Rolle
Comments 700
Reply
no reason. i just hate you.
Reply
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Будто в разных измерениях с ними...
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment