Comments | news: moving forward

news

moving forward

Jun 08, 2007 17:42

I want to say thank you to all of you who have been giving us a chance to correct the issues around suspended journals, and particularly to the abuse volunteers who have been working tirelessly to keep up with your feedback and correct any remaining problems. If there is any doubt, the abuse team thought they were executing exactly the policy that ( Read more... )

Comments 3074

burr86 June 9 2007, 00:57:13 UTC

Thanks for the update! :)

rahaeli June 9 2007, 00:58:24 UTC

cheat0r

burr86 June 9 2007, 00:59:05 UTC

You mean, strategically times his friends page refreshes.

photosinensis June 9 2007, 01:06:16 UTC

No, we mean that you're one of the poor sods who does the coding, and thus would know...aw, screw it. I've seen the code, there's no way you could have cheated.

Thread 17

rival June 9 2007, 00:57:42 UTC

Good.

driftingfocus June 9 2007, 00:57:46 UTC

w00t!

stillimage June 9 2007, 01:12:21 UTC

I dig your user name, a lot.

driftingfocus June 9 2007, 01:26:54 UTC

Thanks! It's like, the opposite of yours!

stillimage June 9 2007, 05:21:57 UTC

Ya welcome. Oh indeed it is. ;] That is maybe why I dig it so much.

necrotica June 9 2007, 00:58:58 UTC

I'm impressed.

atalantapendrag June 9 2007, 00:59:39 UTC

If you want our patience, don't abuse it. We shouldn't have to wait a week between updates.

rahaeli June 9 2007, 01:03:38 UTC

We didn't want to update just to say "hey, still thinking about this!" We wanted to wait until we had substantive progress to report, which is what we were doing this week -- talking to people, talking to each other, and making sure that everyone fully understood the problems and what led to the miscommunications before we could begin to address them.

atalantapendrag June 9 2007, 01:07:16 UTC

And causing even more bad feeling in the process. There are still some serious questions left unanswered here, such as the apparent redefinition of the word "interests" to mean "likes". A "we aren't ignoring you, and there will be more news soon" on Tuesday or Wednesday would have bought quite a bit of much-needed good will.

dr_jekyl June 9 2007, 02:21:34 UTC

I think LJ are in a lose-lose situation. Post quickly without meaningful updates and get lynched; delay until there's something meaningful to say and be lynched. Either way people also complain that not everything they want has been addressed in the post and scream about that.

They will post when they have stuff to post. Can you blame them for wanting to produced a measured responce when this whole situtation was caused by LJ staffers going off half-cocked?

Thread 127