+ dvau +

Apr 14, 2008 22:46



If it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, we have at least to consider the possibility that we have a small aquatic bird of the family anatidae on our hands.

wtf is he talking about?, quotes: douglas noel adams

Leave a comment

[Screened] n_llegacy April 15 2008, 11:44:05 UTC
...The reasoning is accurate. But I am not seeing what point you have for posting this.

[[OOC: Near-mun:HAHAHAAHA*chokes on tea**hack cough* It's very inspirational. *unable to breathe normally for 5 minutes*]]

Reply

[Screened] neuroticsand April 15 2008, 15:24:01 UTC
How much are you seeing?

Reply

[Screened] n_llegacy April 15 2008, 15:56:52 UTC
Not much. Perhaps a potential obsession with water fowl.

Reply

[Screened] neuroticsand April 15 2008, 15:59:15 UTC
Not much indeed.

Are those silk?

Reply

[Screened] n_llegacy April 15 2008, 16:25:41 UTC
Silk? Referring to...?

Reply

[Screened] neuroticsand April 15 2008, 16:42:52 UTC
Your face.

What do you think?
Do you think?

Reply

[Screened] n_llegacy April 15 2008, 16:50:47 UTC
I would assume that I must be able to think in order to function properly and still be alive at this point in time.

In response to your previous question...no? Unless you insist on saying it's silk, in which case I would then try to convince you of the contrary, but will probably fail in the attempt.

Reply

[Screened] neuroticsand April 15 2008, 16:53:16 UTC
POINT. Hm.

It looks more shiny.

Maybe you're cleaner than the last one. He was dirty, dirty.

Reply

[Screened] n_llegacy April 15 2008, 17:06:27 UTC
You were acquainted with my previous version? Which obviously means you know who I am.

My previous self...was he incredibly dislikable?

Reply

[Screened] neuroticsand April 15 2008, 17:14:02 UTC
Unfortunately aware of.

Dislikeable? Who knows.
Unlike what was known, ah, but Econtra does this. Shifting what was, was, is not is unless made to be still . . .

Not the boldest font.

Reply

[Screened] n_llegacy April 15 2008, 18:34:02 UTC
You at least seem to think him disagreeable.

The boundaries, in most worlds in general, are blurred on such facts. Never stagnant.

Reply

[Screened] neuroticsand April 15 2008, 19:33:08 UTC
There is no vice so simple but assumes some mark of virtue on his outward parts.

Reply

[Screened] n_llegacy April 15 2008, 20:31:16 UTC
Hm. Interesting view. I do say I agree.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up