Now keep in mind...Martina Fuchs is an X that obviously hates me and anybody that associates themself with me..You may now continue... :-D
( Read more... )
Hey Tina! Read this!audraidenApril 21 2004, 10:25:37 UTC
Wow. This is incredible. You obviously do not know me, but that does not matter. I am a friend of Mike and Deb, so undoubtedly you automatically hate me, but that doesn't matter to me either. I have read your journal, as well as M's, and many others. You might do well not to criticize others for faults that you, too, possess.
This is completely uncalled for: "Saw a certain nasty skanky disgusting looking whore walking down main near south campus…wearing pants M made….and now it’s official. ***Laughing*** I don’t feel bad for either of them….they deserve eachother…..yuck yuck yuck….**runs away and hides**".
Deb was correct: you do show immaturity by saying something like that. Since when do baggy jeans make a person nasty, skanky, disgusting, or a whore? I know Deb well, she is none of them. If you would look into a dictionary before writing something, you would be able to better describe someone, rather than saying the same thing 4 times in four different words. All four words mean either dirty or sexually promiscuous, or both. I know that she is not dirty, but she is friendly and kind, unless provoked by malicious paragraphs in someone’s LiveJournal. She most certainly is not a prostitute, whore, or whatever else you would like to call someone of that “profession”. Use a thesaurus next time, or better yet, do not do it again!
I also saw your reply to Mike’s comment that he did not give some child “the finger”. You, too, need to take your own advice- learn how to spell. It is spelled “argument”; there is not extra E after the U. I am majoring in English, I catch stupid mistakes like that and this confusing little phrase- “if you even have to capacity for that.” “To capacity”? Right, then. The whole situation is stupid. Maybe he did not give her the finger? Maybe she is lying? Trivial little things causing something like this? Good God.
The pants: As an artist I can understand that M might be upset that someone else was wearing her “artwork”, someone who was not the person those pants were given to. But, do you people even know why she was wearing them? Do you know the circumstances that led to that? Everyone else thinks the pants look awful, but Deb does not! She should take it as a compliment that at least someone thinks those ragged, dirty, mismatched pants are NICE! If one of my most favored paintings that I gave my mother ended up in one of her co-workers houses, I would be damn proud that someone else thought it was beautiful enough to display in public.
And since I do not want to write more than one message, here is a big clue for you girls: Deb is not Mike’s girlfriend you know. Not his current one. She is an Ex, just like both of you, except that she is not just like you. She does not harass his exes. One of them harasses her first, and her saucy reply to your comment is completely understandable. She NEVER acts like you, though. She and Mike are both high above you, as she said, and they should be able to be free of your jealous horrible rants.
Now, I do not care if you send me a horrifying message in return, I just hope I have shown you to be careful what you say about people with friends like me. You kids should grow up and get a life, rather than trying to ruin other people’s lives. I truly hope you will cease your awful writing about my friends. Like Deb said, leave her out of your rants, or she will do something about it. And I will be right by her side.
Re: Hey Tina! Read this!hitokiri_zyroApril 22 2004, 19:51:05 UTC
what the hell is it with these new girls mike is hanging out with your as dumb as deb in what you say. ur talking about tina harassing mike SHE DIDNT U FUCKIN MORON. lemme guess your a blond? she said shit in her own journal and mike being the fucktard he is brought it to his own. mind your own fucking business and go back to kissing mikes ass apparently. god damn you people are stupid.
Grammar, my boy.lies_wovenApril 29 2004, 10:58:51 UTC
what (This is the start of a sentence; "what" should be capitalized.) the hell is it with these new girls mike ("Mike" should be capitalized as well. Names all must be capitalized.) is hanging out with your ("Your" is possessive. You meant to use "you're" which is a combination of "you" and "are.") as dumb as deb (Another name. Her name should be capitalized.) in what you say. ur ("UR" should be "you're" and because it is the beginning of a new sentence, it should be capitalized.) talking about tina (You do not even capitalize your friend's name. Tsk tsk.) harassing mike (AGAIN! Capitalization is obviously a problem for you.) SHE DIDNT (There should be an apostrophe between the "n" and the "t.") U ("You," not "u.") FUCKIN ("FUCKING" not "FUCKIN." You are not a hick. Get it right.) MORON. lemme ("Lemme" is not a word. You should have used "Let me.") guess your ("You're" not "your.") a blond? she (Capitalization.) said shit in her own journal and mike (Capitalization.) being the fucktard ("Fucktard" is not a word. You can't even come up with a decent insult.) he is brought (Shouldn't you have used, "copied it into?") it to his own. mind (Capitalization.) your own fucking business and go back to kissing mikes (Capitalization and an apostrophe between the "e" and the "s.") ass apparently (This word does not belong.). god (Capitalization.) damn you people are stupid (Where's the period at the end of this sentence? Can't you think of a better word than "stupid?")
This is completely uncalled for: "Saw a certain nasty skanky disgusting looking whore walking down main near south campus…wearing pants M made….and now it’s official. ***Laughing*** I don’t feel bad for either of them….they deserve eachother…..yuck yuck yuck….**runs away and hides**".
Deb was correct: you do show immaturity by saying something like that. Since when do baggy jeans make a person nasty, skanky, disgusting, or a whore? I know Deb well, she is none of them. If you would look into a dictionary before writing something, you would be able to better describe someone, rather than saying the same thing 4 times in four different words. All four words mean either dirty or sexually promiscuous, or both. I know that she is not dirty, but she is friendly and kind, unless provoked by malicious paragraphs in someone’s LiveJournal. She most certainly is not a prostitute, whore, or whatever else you would like to call someone of that “profession”. Use a thesaurus next time, or better yet, do not do it again!
I also saw your reply to Mike’s comment that he did not give some child “the finger”. You, too, need to take your own advice- learn how to spell. It is spelled “argument”; there is not extra E after the U. I am majoring in English, I catch stupid mistakes like that and this confusing little phrase- “if you even have to capacity for that.” “To capacity”? Right, then. The whole situation is stupid. Maybe he did not give her the finger? Maybe she is lying? Trivial little things causing something like this? Good God.
The pants: As an artist I can understand that M might be upset that someone else was wearing her “artwork”, someone who was not the person those pants were given to. But, do you people even know why she was wearing them? Do you know the circumstances that led to that? Everyone else thinks the pants look awful, but Deb does not! She should take it as a compliment that at least someone thinks those ragged, dirty, mismatched pants are NICE! If one of my most favored paintings that I gave my mother ended up in one of her co-workers houses, I would be damn proud that someone else thought it was beautiful enough to display in public.
And since I do not want to write more than one message, here is a big clue for you girls: Deb is not Mike’s girlfriend you know. Not his current one. She is an Ex, just like both of you, except that she is not just like you. She does not harass his exes. One of them harasses her first, and her saucy reply to your comment is completely understandable. She NEVER acts like you, though. She and Mike are both high above you, as she said, and they should be able to be free of your jealous horrible rants.
Now, I do not care if you send me a horrifying message in return, I just hope I have shown you to be careful what you say about people with friends like me. You kids should grow up and get a life, rather than trying to ruin other people’s lives. I truly hope you will cease your awful writing about my friends. Like Deb said, leave her out of your rants, or she will do something about it. And I will be right by her side.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment