Ingrid Newkirk is a sponsor of terrorist activity, by NATO definition. She supports the ALF, a terrorist orgasnization that used armed violence to force their opinions upon others. The ALF and Newkirk are *WAY* worse than Michael Vick, mainly because they may never have to stand and face their actions in court. Hell, I'd be amused if they gave her a month in Gitmo just to see what would happen.
Newkirk on Human Reporduction:
"I am not only uninterested in having children. I am opposed to having children. Having a purebred human baby is like having a purebred dog; it is nothing but vanity, human vanity."
Newkirk on her job as an Animal Shelter worker in the 1970's:
"I would go to work early, before anyone got there, and I would just kill the animals myself. Because I couldn't stand to let them go through that. I must have killed a thousand of them, sometimes dozens every day."
...and if you can't believe that the leader of PETA, a person that said she would rather see humans die than lab rats, would admit to killing thousands of interned pound animals... HERE'S THE INTERVIEW. I really don't care if she only killed them "to save them from a longer and more painful death". Having a group that violently opposes any harm to animals while at the same time having harmed thousands yourself... uh, WHAT?
PETA claims that most animals they euthanized were sick or in need of too much care. IT seems that a company that claims that animals are more important than humans would utelize every penny at their disposal to provide the best surgical and post-op care for sick or disabled animals, just as a human rights organization or the WHO would provide for humans.
Yeah, the implications of badmouthing "purebred human babies" squicks me out to a pretty high degree. WHAT'S THE ALTERNATIVE, CRAZY LADY?!! HAVEN'T YOU EVER READ THE ISLAND OF DR. MOREAU? THE ANIMALS DON'T COME OUT ON TOP!!
I love the interview with her replayed in the above view where she wants to release all domestic and farm animals and let them roam about society free to do as they please. I get the mental image of some ALF anarchists cutting the fence on a farmer's land and herding all these cows to their freedom. As they cheer "run, cow! be freeeeee!" the cows charge directly onto a freeway, get hit by a semi that flips, causing the gas tank it's towing to explode and set the other liberated cows on fire.
Newkirk on Human Reporduction:
"I am not only uninterested in having children. I am opposed to having children. Having a purebred human baby is like having a purebred dog; it is nothing but vanity, human vanity."
Newkirk on her job as an Animal Shelter worker in the 1970's:
"I would go to work early, before anyone got there, and I would just kill the animals myself. Because I couldn't stand to let them go through that. I must have killed a thousand of them, sometimes dozens every day."
...and if you can't believe that the leader of PETA, a person that said she would rather see humans die than lab rats, would admit to killing thousands of interned pound animals... HERE'S THE INTERVIEW. I really don't care if she only killed them "to save them from a longer and more painful death". Having a group that violently opposes any harm to animals while at the same time having harmed thousands yourself... uh, WHAT?
Reply
In 2005 Newkirk killed 90% of her defenseless captives and adopted only 6% - a ratio far worse than any pound in the country. Read her own statistics:
Year 2005 2004 2003 2002
Received 2145 2,640 2,224 2,680
Adopted 146 361 312 382
Killed 1946 2,278 1,911 2,298
Transferred 69 1 1 2
% Killed 90.7 86.3 85.9 85.7
% Adopted 06.8 13.7 14.0 14.3
See PETA's paperwork...
PETA claims that most animals they euthanized were sick or in need of too much care. IT seems that a company that claims that animals are more important than humans would utelize every penny at their disposal to provide the best surgical and post-op care for sick or disabled animals, just as a human rights organization or the WHO would provide for humans.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment