women's work
The interaction of how we are to understand each other and the values that run between nations and perceived nations is at the heart of what I research. Transnational perceptions focused on "nerd culture" is a rather narrow field, but I find there is often quite a bit to study when I keep my eyes open. This article on Lee Si-kap's collection of 85 satellite dishes to satisfy his Vietnamese bride, Bui Thi Huang, sets up an interesting picture of transnational ideas of gender.
"In recent years, the South Korean countryside has had an influx of brides from
poorer countries like Vietnam, China and the Philippines. Like Ms. Bui, they
marry South Korean farmers who have difficulty finding a spouse because so many
young Korean women have rejected rural life and migrated to cities."
There is an incredible amount of fascinating things going on here all at once in this phenomenon. First of all I wonder how it is that women in Korea have a greater ability to move away from their rural town into the cities. Is it easier for women to find work in the city than men? Is it difficult for women to find work in rural towns? I wonder if it is heavily pragmatic as this, or is it overlayed by symbolic ideas of men as "country boys" and women as "uptown girls" as portrayed in the US through shows like "Green Acres". The idea of a single women living the city is a long standing mythology which has existed as far back as "Ars Amatoria" by Ovid, with even then carried the same feeling to disdain/admiration.
Then on top of this, is the idea of finding women from "poorer countries" and having them move to South Korea to become wives plays an interesting role of how these men must perceive these women and what they represent for them and for their home country. As this linked article put:
The rising status of women in the United States sent American men who were
searching for more traditional wives to Russia in the 1990s.
Again the product of greater mobility and economic independence for women becomes a punishment for men who desire more "traditional" wives. So as these women move to greater positions in the world, men are left in the dust. It's a strange antagonising of progress for women that seems to unfairly bring guilt to women who want to move up in the world through the limited avenues available to them, and at the same time draws sympathy for men who are unwilling to change with the times. This is similar to the problematic solution presented by Betty Friedan of hiring maids and nannys (from poorer nations) to do the women's work while affluent wives build a career outside the home. If we are to truly understand how gender roles are changing and improving, we must pay close attention to how this is changing as a whole system. Having some women improve their lives to have their previous roles replaced by women of poorer nations may not be the path we are looking for in dramatically changing gender roles in society.