(Untitled)

Jan 18, 2005 18:29

So I got asked to prom yesterday. By Adam. My mom laughed at me and asked me who was going to wear the dress. Mildly funny and stereotypical. It sorta got me thinking. Specifically, it reminded me of a conversation I had with Jesse Laurence once upon a time ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

steve_hamster January 22 2005, 04:21:43 UTC
I have often thought along those lines. It seems like part (or all) of the point of the homosexual movement is to de-link sex (like the kind you are, not the kind you have) from gender/identity. Interestingly, though, a lot of the gay men (intentionally gendered pronoun) I have known seem to portray many of the stereotypes placed on them. It seems self-defeating, like being gay just means you have a different prescribed identity set instead of breaking out of identity stereotypes altogether.

I was going to say that gay celebrities don't help in that respect, but there are people like Ian McKellan who are their own people (meaning they don't hide sexuality, but they also don't act like that dictates everything about them). Maybe you are right, Meghan, that an increasingly queer-friendly culture will lessen this trend.

Reply

spearofsolomon January 27 2005, 16:04:57 UTC
That's an interesting idea. When homosexuality is accepted as normal, then homosexuals can be as comfortable and natural in the formation of their identities as heterosexuals? I hope they aren't expecting much . . .

I see the point. It's worse for gay people, and not just in Ottumwa. ". . . a place where homophobia weren't so rampant and homosexuality less radical," like, Europe?

But don't you think sexual pressure warps everyone's identity while they're still trying to get it together?

On a tangent, I read an interesting and persuasive article about homosexuality in which the author argued that an argument supporting homosexuality that hinges on whether or not homosexuality is genetic is a moral step backward. Main points being that morality can't be encoded genetically, and that "If it's genetic it's ok" also gives rise to "If it isn't genetic than it isn't ok" which seems to circumvent the issue of choice. Anyway.

Reply

Eugenics: Talk Amongst Yourselves steve_hamster January 27 2005, 20:41:21 UTC
"But don't you think sexual pressure warps everyone's identity while they're still trying to get it together?"

This seems patently true. I am thinking of an entire tirade on why it's necessary for the homosexual movement (and those who share its values) to work to end sex/gender binaries, but it will take longer than the space available. As that's my view, though, I must agree that heterosexuality is not a discrete category that is unproblematically and objectively portrayed by our or any other culture.

As to your tangent, it seems like how one feels about that argument is largely pre-determined by how one perceives the gay movement and its goals. If indeed the goal is to introduce the idea of choice into sexuality, then this argument perhaps runs counter. However, the gay movement in the '90s seemed to face much condemnation from people based on people's perception that homosexuality is a choice. The argument, then, was that if sexuality was indeed a choice, it became possible to make it a moral argument. If sexuality was ( ... )

Reply

Re: Eugenics: Talk Amongst Yourselves spearofsolomon January 28 2005, 15:22:19 UTC
Even if genetics and choice are mutually exclusive categories, it does not mean that together they comprise all the reasons "causing" homosexuality. For instance, genetics could serve as a base which might be over-ridden in certain strong circumstances. I keep reading this statistic that says that of identical twins for which one twin is gay, 52% are both gay. That seems to indicate a strong genetic corrolation without showing that genetics is solely responsible. I haven't read the research but it feels like if there were "certain strong circumstances" then identical twins would be more likely to share them, as well ( ... )

Reply

Chappelle spearofsolomon January 28 2005, 16:55:32 UTC
I don't think that video has the whole skit. Maybe the one at Comedy Central does.

http://www.comedycentral.com/tv_shows/chappellesshow/showclips.jhtml?startIndex=7

Reply

neilvanders January 29 2005, 03:03:56 UTC
I have no idea what homophobia is like in Europe. I was referring to either a big city where there are all sorts, or some nebulous time in the future. Hopefully.

Can an identity be warped? I guess pressure to identify does just that...it makes you make yourself. Would you do it otherwise? And what the hell is "trying to get it together"? The way I read it in reference to sexual choice that was that terribly indecisive period where you just don't really know what you are or what you need to be. GLBT...so many choices with so little tolerence. I guess I don't think thats a warp. It think thats growing up.

There are times when I think that the majority of people never worry or wonder. There were born hetero, and would never consider anything else. Then I think about the company executive with a wife and two kids who is sleeping with his male co-worker on the side. Life's just funny like that.

Reply

steve_hamster January 29 2005, 16:43:54 UTC
The reason you discard Nate's arguments so easily seems to be your perception that non-normative sexual preferences are the only part of our identity that is shaped by immense cultural pressure. I'm sorry that's not actually the case. GLBT or not, everyone struggles with creating him/her self. Even heterosexuality is distorted and packaged and deployed in various ways that make it difficult for anyone to determine his/her own sexuality. If Adam lived in a place where homosexuality were more tolerated, he would be no more free from pressures on his identity. But he might be less likely to adopt homosexual stereotypes.

Reply

He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named... neilvanders February 2 2005, 02:53:43 UTC
I see what you mean. I didn't really mean just sexuality exclusively...it's really just one example. Pressure to identify can really suck. There's a girl in my vocal class who chided me for using such evil words as "God" and "Bible." She proclaims herself an athiest. For what, I don't know. It seems to me she defeats her own purpose. To not believe is fine. But to try so hard to identify yourself with a certian stereotype isn't. Maybe I'm just bad at reading people, but it seemed like a big fat act to me.

Reply

spearofsolomon January 31 2005, 00:25:46 UTC
Well, first let me say that I'm not trying to offend you, and I'm not arguing with you about anything ( ... )

Reply


Leave a comment

Up