A traitor? Wow, this case just keeps getting worse. And who the heck is Rory the Roman? Is he somehow tied to the Navy? I gotta say crime in DC is weirder than anything we see out in LA.
I fully agree Sam. The weirdness of this particular attack clearly says that DC is a much different city than we originially thought.
I wonder if it's too soon to start pointing fingers... We had an attack yesterday on someone with a direct Navy connection, and now someone who seems to be involved in the 'fantasy world'... Suspicious if you ask me...
All of you from LA seem to be forgetting the fact that we now have three assassins to find instead of just two. We need to find one of them today or we are in big trouble.
I think the attack on this Rory the Roman is either unrelated to the first attack or is just a distraction meant to point us in the wrong direction. Remember, the second attack ended with the assassins turning that person into a traitor in our midst, so it was also an attack on someone connected to NCIS.
I think we need to concentrate on finding out who killed Detective McGarrett. That way, we can find at least one of the assassins.
There's nothing worse than a killer who picks his targets at random. But I have to agree with Ms. McGee that this might be a distraction from Commander McGarrett's murder. Perhaps we need to retrace our steps and focus on that before moving forward. I'd be interested to hear what Mr. Getz has to say about this as well.
~ Lauren Hunter
((Thanks! I love the character in Tron... So epically awesome :D))
Random killers are certainly the worst; they establish no patterns that we can follow. It usually indicates a sloppiness, though, meaning they may slip up more easily.
Did anyone here have a connection to Hawaii that may have put McGarrett in danger? Maybe he saw or heard something he shouldn't have.
If I remember correctly, wasn't Agent Cassidy stationed in Hawaii at some point? Or perhaps I'm thinking of Gitmo... There's simply too much information to digest when pulling files on agents.
Seriously? The murder of a SciFi character is weirder than anything you've come across in LA LA Land? I find that really hard to believe. I think his murder is a distraction and can be discounted in our investigation.
Remember Ms.McGee, I've only been in LA a few short months, and part of that time was spent overseas. This is one of my first cases since I've returned to the States. So, in fact, this is the weirdest case I've worked in my Los Angeles career. Sad, but true.
~Sam Hanna
Reply
I wonder if it's too soon to start pointing fingers... We had an attack yesterday on someone with a direct Navy connection, and now someone who seems to be involved in the 'fantasy world'... Suspicious if you ask me...
~ Lauren Hunter
Reply
Nate - what do you think? Come up with anything on your psychological profile?
~Sam Hanna
((BTW - your icon is awesome))
Reply
I think the attack on this Rory the Roman is either unrelated to the first attack or is just a distraction meant to point us in the wrong direction. Remember, the second attack ended with the assassins turning that person into a traitor in our midst, so it was also an attack on someone connected to NCIS.
I think we need to concentrate on finding out who killed Detective McGarrett. That way, we can find at least one of the assassins.
~Sarah McGee
Reply
~ Lauren Hunter
((Thanks! I love the character in Tron... So epically awesome :D))
Reply
Did anyone here have a connection to Hawaii that may have put McGarrett in danger? Maybe he saw or heard something he shouldn't have.
~Nate Getz
Reply
~ Lauren Hunter
Reply
~Sarah McGee
Reply
~ Lauren Hunter
Reply
~Nate Getz
Reply
~Sarah McGee
Reply
~ Lauren Hunter
Reply
Leave a comment