It's not every couple that makes a pair
Monologue.
По инглишу как сигда задали поразмышлять на тему. Тема такая (для непосвященных): не каждая парочка может стать семейной парой (вольный перевод, но чтоб понятнее)). Так вот. во время придумывания монолога пришла классная философская мысля сравнить пары с паззлами. Ну поразвивала темку - вот что получилось.
PS аж самой нравится. пока не надоест и не найду кучу недостатоков в своей теории)
It may seem that words ‘couple and pair’ are synonymous. But looking their meanings inside out one can find out that ‘a couple’ is just two and comprises just a little sense of unity whereas ‘a pair’ implies the very meaning of compatibility.
Those who are called a pair match each other like puzzles in mosaic. First people are different puzzles and may form a couple with another puzzle. Each of the partners have sth characteristic of them only, say, that’s a picture on the detail, and at the same time they do sth in common with a partner to make the puzzles be united.
Then and only then the pair is made.
And like a puzzle may find 4 of others, as a rule, - 3 of them mean relatives and a closest friend and there’s the last one like a good match, that fills the last gap up - and helps create the complete picture of life. Such ones are also called soul-mates.
As for puzzle-couples, why they split up sometimes, I shall say, sometimes we make a mistake putting one puzzle near the wrong one - and it seems like colors match but…. Looking carefully or trying to complete the picture we see a little crack between those 2 details set in a wrong place.
So, it’s not every couple that makes a pair.