Re: the other side of the story.nameherloverOctober 15 2005, 18:58:11 UTC
I read through your blog. I believe a preparation makes sense, but to have specific people answer certain questions, and to be prepared as far as telling someone whatt to say in response...
There is too much preparation there. This war has gone on far too long, Bush has done too many things for me to repect him as our president. He behaves ignobly, and I would rather see someone with more poise and intelligence
"President of the United States, our Commander-in-Chief, President Bush, so I believe that it would have been totally irresponsible for us NOT to prepare some ideas, facts or comments that we wanted to share with the President. We were given an idea as to what topics he may discuss with us, but it's the President of the United States; He will choose which way his conversation with us may go."
That last statement I pulled from your blog seems a bit out of place. He will choose which way his conversation goes? I apologize, but the one asking the questions can choose where to take a theme or idea. he can ask relating questions, but it's how you answer. Honesty is all the American people want. From as much as I read about the war, I don't believe we receive the entire story. Especially with coverage such as CNN and FOX. I am most surprised by the Washington Post because it's a predominantly conservative paper. To read such a response makes you question our president/government's credibility. Change could do a lot for us.
I'm in New York, and it seems every time there is a huge event centering around our administration, suddenly there is a terror alert close behind. I'm not big on conspiracy theories.. but when a president even begins to receive criticism from the neoconservatives.... It raises eyebrows.
As an American citizen, I am behind those over in Iraq, fighting for the nation. I respect the risk, I respect the loyalty... I do not respect the reasons they are there. You can't spread democracy around the world when you act as a republic. But thank you, Ron, for the insight.
There is too much preparation there. This war has gone on far too long, Bush has done too many things for me to repect him as our president. He behaves ignobly, and I would rather see someone with more poise and intelligence
"President of the United States, our Commander-in-Chief, President Bush, so I believe that it would have been totally irresponsible for us NOT to prepare some ideas, facts or comments that we wanted to share with the President.
We were given an idea as to what topics he may discuss with us, but it's the President of the United States; He will choose which way his conversation with us may go."
That last statement I pulled from your blog seems a bit out of place. He will choose which way his conversation goes? I apologize, but the one asking the questions can choose where to take a theme or idea. he can ask relating questions, but it's how you answer. Honesty is all the American people want. From as much as I read about the war, I don't believe we receive the entire story. Especially with coverage such as CNN and FOX. I am most surprised by the Washington Post because it's a predominantly conservative paper. To read such a response makes you question our president/government's credibility. Change could do a lot for us.
I'm in New York, and it seems every time there is a huge event centering around our administration, suddenly there is a terror alert close behind. I'm not big on conspiracy theories.. but when a president even begins to receive criticism from the neoconservatives.... It raises eyebrows.
As an American citizen, I am behind those over in Iraq, fighting for the nation. I respect the risk, I respect the loyalty... I do not respect the reasons they are there. You can't spread democracy around the world when you act as a republic. But thank you, Ron, for the insight.
Reply
Leave a comment