symbiotic development does not make sense
so cells engulf and symbiotocally develop mitochondria and chloroplasts.
how does that make sense.
how is it that a cell can intake something, and then next thing you know, that thing it took in is actually a part of cells that are being born. that structure would not be programmed into its DNA.
i mean seriously. that totally defies logic and the very claim that evolutional science itself makes, but the people who believe evolution believe this is how mitochondria and chloroplasts developed.
freaking self-contradictory...
seriously. i do not understand why people believe this. the commonly accepted scientific belief of life from spontaneous generation and thereafter the evolution and divergence from a single cell into all life as we know it today... is so full of holes.
it makes absolutely no sense.
the more biology i learn, the more i wonder why biologists can believe some of this stuff.
how does that make sense.
how is it that a cell can intake something, and then next thing you know, that thing it took in is actually a part of cells that are being born. that structure would not be programmed into its DNA.
i mean seriously. that totally defies logic and the very claim that evolutional science itself makes, but the people who believe evolution believe this is how mitochondria and chloroplasts developed.
freaking self-contradictory...
seriously. i do not understand why people believe this. the commonly accepted scientific belief of life from spontaneous generation and thereafter the evolution and divergence from a single cell into all life as we know it today... is so full of holes.
it makes absolutely no sense.
the more biology i learn, the more i wonder why biologists can believe some of this stuff.