Profile Page Override

Dec 22, 2008 15:23


Stylish override for the profile pages.Requires that you have Stylish for Firefox, or some other means to override CSS. Instructions are there, and clear. And it really makes the profile pages look much more manageable. It reinstates the underlining for friends and interests, fixes the font problems, adds an indent to each section, removes the ( Read more... )

links

Leave a comment

Comments 11

kightp December 22 2008, 21:38:13 UTC
I bypass my profile page entirely by using the old-but-still-extant LJ Portal page as my entry point. While it doesn't change how my profile page looks to others, it does prevent me from getting annoyed every time I load my own journal. (-:

Reply

naamah_darling December 22 2008, 22:23:05 UTC
That's still around? Awesome!

Reply

kightp December 22 2008, 22:28:32 UTC
Yep. I added it to my browser's menu bar back when it was being promoted as the Great New Thing (and I rather thought it *was*. LJ's designers have switched directions and removed all evidence of it from the site's various link pages, but the Portal is still there.

So much more useful than the latest mess.

Reply

daez December 22 2008, 22:33:39 UTC
ooh, fave'd that. Thanks for the link, I didn't know it even existed anymore!

Reply


daez December 22 2008, 21:41:37 UTC
Ooooh, thank you! Installed and using now!

I hate the new profile layouts. :( Wish they'd let us enable an option to go back to the old ones.

Reply

naamah_darling December 22 2008, 22:22:14 UTC
Me, too. I can see why they really can't, from a logistical standpoint, but . . . the new design sucks so bad.

Reply


flewellyn December 22 2008, 22:26:11 UTC
The thing about the profile page business that really irritates me?

It's yet another stupid thing they worked on, instead of adding a very necessary feature that's been long needed, and much requested: the ability to search the LJs of friends, respecting security tags and "friends-only" settings.

Right now there is no good, robust way to search LJ.

Reply

naamah_darling December 22 2008, 22:32:11 UTC
I've wanted that too, really badly. And they could even make it opt-out, like, if you didn't want your journal to be searchable, you could nix it.

Reply

flewellyn December 22 2008, 22:35:36 UTC
I think that would defeat the purpose. The whole point of this idea is that the search mechanism would be built into LJ, and would respect the built in filtering LJ already provides. So only friends could search on friends-only posts, for instance, or people who are on a particular filter could search that filter. There wouldn't be any need for further barriers.

Reply

naamah_darling December 22 2008, 22:42:57 UTC
True. If it respected security levels already in place, there wouldn't be much of an issue with people accessing information that they shouldn't be seeing anyway.

Reply


the_xtina December 22 2008, 22:37:21 UTC

Leave a comment

Up