A friend, who has asked to remain anonymous for fear of leg-biting, poses a question about being childfree. It's a legitimate one that I have been asked before, but never seen answered. (And no, dear anonymous reader, I don't find the question offensive. I'm actually glad you asked.)
"I've been wondering why it's necessary to have the label.
(
Read more... )
Reply
So we're safe for a while... at least safe from a sudden lack of breeding... definately not safe from the idiocy though, unfortunately.
Reply
Alas, it would be a much more beneficial use of my time to go on a vigilante sterilization run for the idiots than to beg the smart people to reproduce.
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
I would never wish an accidental child on anyone - no matter how smart, assinine, nice, upstanding, intelligent or stupid they were.
Reply
I don't owe it to "society" to breed any more than I owe it to "god" to breed.
And stupidity isn't necessarily genetic - nor necessarily any worse than it used to be.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Seriously, though? The more developmental psych class I take, the less I want kids.
Reply
Modern life is superior in most ways. One of the ways it fails is in the absence of a large family/clan structure to provide support to mothers and children.
Reply
Maybe we should coin a new term, and use it as the start of forming a commune somewhere where those who are inclied to do the incubation and those who are inclined to be part time parents can like. Make that happen or something. Wouldn't be the first time.
Reply
Reply
It's nice. A lot of the smart people I know do have kids, more than one. So I feel good about our odds. And that's all I need to worry about, isn't it? Feeling good about the future I will not see.
I don't have to worry about the world my kids will live in.
Thank goodness.
Reply
Leave a comment