Leave a comment

kandescence November 20 2011, 20:31:19 UTC
[Oh it's you. That smug attitude is instantly recognizable, which means that mostly he's answering just to be contrary.]

He's one--Becker. [Cryptic enough to be totally unhelpful, which is fine because Kanda's not really wanting to be helpful.]

Reply

diredormouse November 21 2011, 10:17:23 UTC
...

[Oh it's you. The rude, annoying one.]

I do hope that was meant to hardly be an answer, or I would be quite concerned for the workings of your mind.

[AKA your intelligence.]

Reply

kandescence November 21 2011, 16:37:29 UTC
[As though needing to elaborate must mean that he's speaking to someone unusually dim,]

Becker. He's one of the missing.

Reply

diredormouse November 22 2011, 12:29:15 UTC
Ah.

Thank you, then.

[He'll have to see if he can find any notes.]

Reply

kandescence November 23 2011, 22:04:40 UTC
Hmph. [Read: I don't want any damn thanks from you.]

You're picking this up, then. [The record-keeping, he means, though again he doesn't bother specifying.] And the disappearances? Their dates.

Reply

diredormouse November 25 2011, 06:38:50 UTC
[Oh, he doesn't want to give any damn thanks, but he's trying to be the better person here.]

The only one I am sure of would be the one you reported, on the 10th. Lenalee, was it? I would guess Becker disappeared around that time as well, yes? Some day later, perhaps. And I do believe I haven't seen Howard Link for a while.

Reply

kandescence November 25 2011, 08:25:48 UTC
[He starts to make a sound in the affirmative at the first two, but there's unmistakable surprise at hearing Link's name included on the list, especially after his previous conversation with Allen.]

Link?

[Allen had asked Kanda if he knew for sure that the Inspector wasn't missing, but Kanda had thought he was just blowing hot air. Now he's not so sure.]

Reply

diredormouse December 10 2011, 19:43:44 UTC
Yes. Not that I keep that much of a close eye on everyone.

[He gives an amused chuckle. Except... he rather does. But no one else needs to know that, of course.]

Reply


Leave a comment

Up