wonder
"I am someone who's looking for love... real love. Ridiculous... inconvienient... consuming... can't live without each other, love."
is that what love is?
i personally think 'love' CAN be inconvenienient as well as consuming (which are bad).
i like the two other pieces of it ('ridiculous' and 'can't live without each other') but to make these two good parts exist, do you have to HAVE the 'inconvienient' and 'consuming'?
see, i identified my view as it CAN be these things- but maybe only depending on the person.
for example, old people have all the time in... well, they've got enough time to waste on hopeless love. but a college student, or someone passionate about their career, or maybe even someone who is never in one place for long, sees 'love' as an inconvenience. right?
so unless you don't have plans for your life, love WILL be 'inconvienient' and 'consuming,' at the same time as 'ridiculous' and 'can't live without each other.'
therefore, is that quote accurate?
is that what love is?
i personally think 'love' CAN be inconvenienient as well as consuming (which are bad).
i like the two other pieces of it ('ridiculous' and 'can't live without each other') but to make these two good parts exist, do you have to HAVE the 'inconvienient' and 'consuming'?
see, i identified my view as it CAN be these things- but maybe only depending on the person.
for example, old people have all the time in... well, they've got enough time to waste on hopeless love. but a college student, or someone passionate about their career, or maybe even someone who is never in one place for long, sees 'love' as an inconvenience. right?
so unless you don't have plans for your life, love WILL be 'inconvienient' and 'consuming,' at the same time as 'ridiculous' and 'can't live without each other.'
therefore, is that quote accurate?