Fuck You Chemistry Labs
Dear Chemistry Lab TA's and Department Head:
I hate you.
You guys take off ridiculous amounts of marks for format instead of processes of answers and methods. I could easily get a 0/10 if I have a few errors in significant figures, titles, and units. What's the deal with that? That's so unfair! What justifies if a title is descriptive enough, or whether a graph is used to its maximum width and height? Isn't it unjust for students to feel the weight of badly judged labs when, in the overall scheme of things, their marks are on well, average?
There needs to be a limit as to how many marks can actually be deducted. Those fucking numbers, titles, pencil/pen uses - they're all so insignificant in comparison to methods and REAL experimental answers.
Why won't you guys understand and WAKE UP?
We're not machines who can draw exact curves, write titles that you think are suitable, or include dismissable units that need not be mentioned.
Why the flip are you guys so fucking senile?
ARGH#>?!?!
I hate you.
You guys take off ridiculous amounts of marks for format instead of processes of answers and methods. I could easily get a 0/10 if I have a few errors in significant figures, titles, and units. What's the deal with that? That's so unfair! What justifies if a title is descriptive enough, or whether a graph is used to its maximum width and height? Isn't it unjust for students to feel the weight of badly judged labs when, in the overall scheme of things, their marks are on well, average?
There needs to be a limit as to how many marks can actually be deducted. Those fucking numbers, titles, pencil/pen uses - they're all so insignificant in comparison to methods and REAL experimental answers.
Why won't you guys understand and WAKE UP?
We're not machines who can draw exact curves, write titles that you think are suitable, or include dismissable units that need not be mentioned.
Why the flip are you guys so fucking senile?
ARGH#>?!?!