IIT Madras is hiring
new faculty. I heard ahead of time that an
advertisement was coming out on the 20th and I was eagerly looking forward
to see it. What struck me most was how unwelcoming it was.
The advertisement started of inviting "applications from Indian
Nationals with an established record ..." (emphasis mine). I understand
IITs are a government institution, but why restrict faculty positions to
citizens. State-run universities in the US allow non-US citizens to work,
and the USCIS
exempts non-immigrants employed in institutions of higher
education from their normal H-1B cap.
The experience asked of Assistant Professor applicants includes
"Candidates preferably should be below 35 years of age." Ageism is
institutionalized in India, but shouldn't institutes of higher learning
lead the way in being non-discriminatory? Even IISc's unofficial
recruitment page is explicit in its
discrimination. The UT-Austin
faculty recruitment website has a simple line that says
"The University of
Texas at Austin is an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer."
Sometime ago, I came across the following statement on D. E. Shaw's
recruitment page (emphasis mine). I would be so happy to work in
such a place.
The members of the D. E. Shaw group do not discriminate in employment
matters on the basis of sex, race, colour, caste, creed, religion,
pregnancy, national origin, age, military service eligibility, veteran
status, sexual orientation, marital status, disability, or any other
protected class. Note that for us, this is more than just legal
boilerplate. We are genuinely committed to these principles, which form
an important part of our corporate culture.
And, when it comes to the
application form itself, I fail to
understand the point of filling out an application form with details that
are already in one's CV. What is the point of asking one to fill in the
"number" of papers? What does differentiating between "Journal" and
"Conference" publications serve? Journals and conferences are valued
differently in different areas. Moreover the tier of each
conference/journal itself has to be considered. A quote from an article
about
journals versus conferences in Computer Science.
Some lesser-ranked universities evaluate faculty on the basis of journal
publications, because the Dean of Engineering is unable or unwilling to
understand computer science. In most scientific fields, journals have
higher standards than conferences; computer science is a rare exception.
A top-ranked CS department can convince the dean to use the proper
evaluation metric. A lower-ranked CS department cannot (the dean may
think the department is trying to fool him or her). If you are at one of
these universities, you will need to publish in journals, probably by
submitting slightly revised versions of your conference papers to
journals. The rush for people at lower-ranked universities (some of whom
are excellent researchers, and some of whom are not) to submit even
marginal results to journals is another regrettable factor that tends to
lower the overall quality of journals.
And I don't know what the difference is between an international and a
national venue. After all, the famed AAAI Conference, till a couple of
years ago
was a national conference. Do national conferences and
journals allow papers only from "Indian Nationals" just like IIT Madras
itself does?
What offended me the most, and prompted this post is the application asking
a person's religion. How is this even remotely connected to making a
decision on a candidate's application? The only connection I can see is
discrimination. I have not seen private sector companies or other
educational institutions ask this information, so, I don't think IIT Madras
is mandated to collect this information, even for the purpose of collecting
statistics.
This application form would have been prepared at the direction of some
IIT-M faculty members. After all, they are the people who make decisions
and know what information they need to make such a decision. I am surprised
they asked for this field to be there, or it was not caught by any one.