Good times in the land o'cheese

Feb 17, 2008 12:45

Clinton or Obama? Apparently, it's a toss up. I predict Obama will take it with a slight margin.

Some interesting factoids from the article, source here:

When the state that gave us Cheeseheads, "Laverne & Shirley" and political progressives holds its presidential primary Tuesday, the results could help determine whether Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama gets the Democratic nomination.
Clinton led there by 9 points early this month, according to one major survey, but two more recent polls show Obama now with a small lead.

President Lyndon Johnson dropped his re-election bid in 1968 when he realized that he was poised to lose Wisconsin's Democratic primary to Gene McCarthy.
Eight years earlier, John F. Kennedy's win in the state's primary over next-door-neighbor Hubert H. Humphrey of Minnesota helped establish the credibility of his national appeal. In 1992, Wisconsin Democrats narrowly chose Bill Clinton over California's Jerry Brown, pointing the way for the national party's ultimate choice.

In general elections the nation's 18th largest state, with about 5.6 million residents, has been a battleground. It chose Democrat John Kerry over President Bush by only 50-49 percent in 2004, and Democrat Al Gore over Bush by about 5,000 votes in 2000.



Crucial step for Clinton, Obama
Wisconsin primary plays historic role in shaping presidential elections
By MARGARET TALEV
McClatchy Newspapers
Article Last Updated: 02/17/2008 01:38:08 AM PST

WASHINGTON - Wisconsin's blue-collar and liberal traditions run through American pop culture and politics. When the state that gave us Cheeseheads, "Laverne & Shirley" and political progressives holds its presidential primary Tuesday, the results could help determine whether Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama gets the Democratic nomination.
Clinton led there by 9 points early this month, according to one major survey, but two more recent polls show Obama now with a small lead.

Even if Wisconsin turns into a blowout, their rivalry almost certainly will endure through bigger primaries March 4 in Texas and Ohio. Nevertheless, Wisconsin's often historic role in shaping past presidential elections makes it a state worth watching.

President Lyndon Johnson dropped his re-election bid in 1968 when he realized that he was poised to lose Wisconsin's Democratic primary to Gene McCarthy.

Eight years earlier, John F. Kennedy's win in the state's primary over next-door-neighbor Hubert H. Humphrey of Minnesota helped establish the credibility of his national appeal. In 1992, Wisconsin Democrats narrowly chose Bill Clinton over California's Jerry Brown, pointing the way for the national party's ultimate choice.

In general elections the nation's 18th largest state, with about 5.6 million residents, has been a battleground. It chose Democrat John Kerry over President Bush by only 50-49 percent in 2004, and Democrat Al Gore over Bush by about 5,000 votes in 2000.

Clinton and Obama each have constituencies in the state, said Barry Burden, a professor of political science at University of Wisconsin, Madison.
"It's a lot of working-class whites without college educations, who are social moderates and responsible Midwesterners," Burden said. Manufacturing makes up more than one-fourth of the state's industry. These voters are a core part of Clinton's constituency.

At the same time, Burden said, "you do have that progressive, reformist element, and I think the antiwar element is tied up in that." That profile fits key parts of Obama's coalition. Two polls taken since Feb. 8 put Obama ahead of Clinton, but only by 4 percentage points, at or near the surveys' statistical margins of error. While that isn't much of a lead, Clinton had led by 9 points on Feb. 6-7, according to an American Research Group poll released Feb. 8, so the trend is clear.

What seems to have pushed Obama ahead in Wisconsin is not his more liberal reputation, Burden said, but "the energy coming off of the other states" where he's beaten Clinton in eight straight contests starting Feb. 9.

Obama has some advantages in Wisconsin: his home state, Illinois, is next door. Wisconsin Gov. Jim Doyle backs him. Obama has been campaigning there more vigorously than Clinton. Last Tuesday, while awaiting results from the "Potomac Primary" of Virginia, Maryland and the District of Columbia, Clinton went to Texas, but Obama went to Wisconsin.

With Obama pulling ahead, Clinton is refocusing her attention on the state after concentrating most recently on Texas and Ohio. Former President Clinton campaigned there on Valentine's Day and the candidate herself was scheduled to be there from Saturday through Election Day.

"I think they want to prevent a complete blowout in Wisconsin," Burden said. "They don't want to say they're competing seriously because they're likely to lose Wisconsin. At the same time, they don't want to fall terribly behind in the delegate count, which is looking more and more important each day."

Mark Jefferson, the executive director of the Republican Party of Wisconsin, said he thought that Obama's surge in Wisconsin was being overestimated.

"I wouldn't underestimate the Clinton machine. I think too many people are at this point," he said. "Voters in both parties here are accustomed to throwing curve balls, and I think the Clinton team is more formidable than a lot of people want to give them credit for."

In other cheesehead news, they are erecting a statue of The Fonz in Milwaukee.

wisconsin, politics

Previous post Next post
Up