As a New Zealander, it's a lot easier for me to understand the accent, I think. Some of the people subtitled, like the man talking about his wife and the gangsters' boss, were understandable (to me) to the point of actually pulling me out of the movie while others I could fully understand.
There are so many possibilities in the why they are there, I would have trouble going with the 'escaped prisoner' idea purely because there were so very many alien weapons around.
Aliens-as-virus facinates me, I have to admit. I like the idea that maybe the majority of the aliens were a third race who managed, in their new forms, to infilterate, capture and start the ship with no idea of how to run it. Christopher seems to have an extremely highly developed sense of responsibility towards the others which, with his ability to run the ship, makes it unlikely that he could be both an original alien and a sympathizer especially as his entire plan revolves around going home for help. We could take it a step further here and have the original flavour aliens at some sort of evolutionary dead end and so they infect and convert others in the hopes that these other races will bring whatever evolutionary advantages they have to their new race a la Alien Chestbursting.
Just the amount of material avaliable to work with is facinating, there's so much to think about.
One thing I find interesting is that, when purchasing tickets, you can always tell a South African - not always by their accents, SA, Australia and NZ have major similarities - by the way they always ask for a ticket to District 6.
I was thinking the amount of weaponry was rather consistent with the prison ship theory. There would be some weapons, but not enough to, say, mount a resistance against the humans.
As for the infection theory, perhaps "prawning" is a common pitfall of interstellar space travel, as the parasites are widely spread. The aliens may have a treatment for it, but it requires returning to their homeworld (1-1/2 years to get there, and 1-1/2 years back).
I should add... one detail I like about foreign films as an advantage over mainstream American cinema: they are much more open to interpretation. Americans have a tendency to overexplain everything, underline every point four times. Sometimes, I'd prefer to let my imagination loose, and take some time to chew on what I have just seen.
The amount of weaponry, sure, what they do...not so much. The ones that explode people I can understand, but the ones that are essentially giant rocket launchers would be very dangerous to use inside a space ship, not to mention the exoskeleton.
My little pet theory is that they were invaders, colonists, that were in suspended animation. For some reason (possibly that it was experimental), it didn't take and most of the aliens woke up partway through the voyage. Most of the aliens we see are their descendants and CJ is one of the originals, forcibly awoken when the ship itself ran out of power probably due to the strain of keeping so many creatures alive. That ould explain the weapons, the differences between CJ and the rest and the ship stopping.
I don't think it's an American problem, I think it's a (as you said) mainstream American problem, being that those movies that are explicitly made for profit tend to go for what is popular and what is popular is something that doesn't require any work on behalf of the viewer - Twilight is a perfect example of this. I'm also tempted to blame Steven Spielberg a bit, for all that he's one of my favourite directors, because his style of film-making is so streamlined, everything is in there for a reason which means that nothing is ambiguious, and he is so very good at it. Or was. American cinema is more than capable of coming up with complex, ambiguious stories - you can't tell me the ending of Fight Club isn't ambiguious or Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, eXistenZ, while Canadian (all hail Chronenberg!), is really something else.
Speaking of foreign films, have you seen Fearless? It is incredibly beautiful. Night Watch (Timur Bekmambetov) is a lot of fun as well and if you're going for ambiguity, check out Russian Arc. It makes me a bit sad that more people don't watch foreign films, I'd love them to be more widely avaliable.
There are so many possibilities in the why they are there, I would have trouble going with the 'escaped prisoner' idea purely because there were so very many alien weapons around.
Aliens-as-virus facinates me, I have to admit. I like the idea that maybe the majority of the aliens were a third race who managed, in their new forms, to infilterate, capture and start the ship with no idea of how to run it. Christopher seems to have an extremely highly developed sense of responsibility towards the others which, with his ability to run the ship, makes it unlikely that he could be both an original alien and a sympathizer especially as his entire plan revolves around going home for help.
We could take it a step further here and have the original flavour aliens at some sort of evolutionary dead end and so they infect and convert others in the hopes that these other races will bring whatever evolutionary advantages they have to their new race a la Alien Chestbursting.
Just the amount of material avaliable to work with is facinating, there's so much to think about.
One thing I find interesting is that, when purchasing tickets, you can always tell a South African - not always by their accents, SA, Australia and NZ have major similarities - by the way they always ask for a ticket to District 6.
Reply
As for the infection theory, perhaps "prawning" is a common pitfall of interstellar space travel, as the parasites are widely spread. The aliens may have a treatment for it, but it requires returning to their homeworld (1-1/2 years to get there, and 1-1/2 years back).
Reply
Reply
My little pet theory is that they were invaders, colonists, that were in suspended animation. For some reason (possibly that it was experimental), it didn't take and most of the aliens woke up partway through the voyage. Most of the aliens we see are their descendants and CJ is one of the originals, forcibly awoken when the ship itself ran out of power probably due to the strain of keeping so many creatures alive. That ould explain the weapons, the differences between CJ and the rest and the ship stopping.
I don't think it's an American problem, I think it's a (as you said) mainstream American problem, being that those movies that are explicitly made for profit tend to go for what is popular and what is popular is something that doesn't require any work on behalf of the viewer - Twilight is a perfect example of this. I'm also tempted to blame Steven Spielberg a bit, for all that he's one of my favourite directors, because his style of film-making is so streamlined, everything is in there for a reason which means that nothing is ambiguious, and he is so very good at it. Or was. American cinema is more than capable of coming up with complex, ambiguious stories - you can't tell me the ending of Fight Club isn't ambiguious or Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, eXistenZ, while Canadian (all hail Chronenberg!), is really something else.
Speaking of foreign films, have you seen Fearless? It is incredibly beautiful. Night Watch (Timur Bekmambetov) is a lot of fun as well and if you're going for ambiguity, check out Russian Arc. It makes me a bit sad that more people don't watch foreign films, I'd love them to be more widely avaliable.
Reply
Leave a comment