Time is running the fuck out.
They say that Barack just looks good on paper in the form of beautifully written speeches. Hillary just looks good, on paper.
They contest that Obama's inspiring speeches generate an emotional response so strong that it blinds. But in Hillary, I see too high an amount of generalizations, which I see are just the conventional way, the same old political bullshit, of blinding people with emotion. If anything, it may be even more blinding because it is conventional.
Hillary shows passion for finally manifesting liberal ideals. She emphasizes that this passion is the foundation for her plans. Totally totally, dude, huge props for her passion and determination- I highly respect and value it. Barack shows a capability to intricately devise plans in order to manifest liberal ideals. I see Hillary's passionate beliefs as generalizations preempting plans that will carry out those beliefs; I see Barack preempting the manifestations of those said liberal ideals with the development of intricate plans. Bottom up or top down, people? THIS is true grassroots, and the true liberal ideal.
I see more and more Americans (and this is what they call the phenomenon, of which I am proudly a part) finding in Barack the method for change that all human beings in their nature, no matter the political position, need from their commander in chief. I see an intellectual capacity to extrapolate what is hiddenly inherent of the souls of human nature and to political physics, philosophical physics, all physics; the type of intellectual capacity that is unparalleled to the average brain and to the average brain of even all our leaders. This is profoundly unconventional politics.
In Hillary, I hear passion; I hear "liberal" passion; I hear her being emotionally seduced by the liberal need for change from a conservative America, something I think to which most liberals can admit to be victims. But we are voting for a commander in chief, not simply another passionate liberal who is begging for the implementation of liberal ideals. Her emotional seduction is breeding a flat out attack on Republicans, and I am uncomfortable with how often I hear these generalizations-in-the-form-of-attacks flow from her mouth. Just as much as Romney declares McCain as a sway from true conservatism, this is not true liberalism.
And Hillary and Barack are both self-declared activists for unconventional politics. Hey it's your decision to determine which one is the more effective activist. I determine: Barack.
And this is why he's our fuckin homeboy.
I admit, I do wish he was a woman.
But I also bet he's better in bed than Hillary.
And that's hot.
Ok, I think that's it, for now.
They contest that Obama's inspiring speeches generate an emotional response so strong that it blinds. But in Hillary, I see too high an amount of generalizations, which I see are just the conventional way, the same old political bullshit, of blinding people with emotion. If anything, it may be even more blinding because it is conventional.
Hillary shows passion for finally manifesting liberal ideals. She emphasizes that this passion is the foundation for her plans. Totally totally, dude, huge props for her passion and determination- I highly respect and value it. Barack shows a capability to intricately devise plans in order to manifest liberal ideals. I see Hillary's passionate beliefs as generalizations preempting plans that will carry out those beliefs; I see Barack preempting the manifestations of those said liberal ideals with the development of intricate plans. Bottom up or top down, people? THIS is true grassroots, and the true liberal ideal.
I see more and more Americans (and this is what they call the phenomenon, of which I am proudly a part) finding in Barack the method for change that all human beings in their nature, no matter the political position, need from their commander in chief. I see an intellectual capacity to extrapolate what is hiddenly inherent of the souls of human nature and to political physics, philosophical physics, all physics; the type of intellectual capacity that is unparalleled to the average brain and to the average brain of even all our leaders. This is profoundly unconventional politics.
In Hillary, I hear passion; I hear "liberal" passion; I hear her being emotionally seduced by the liberal need for change from a conservative America, something I think to which most liberals can admit to be victims. But we are voting for a commander in chief, not simply another passionate liberal who is begging for the implementation of liberal ideals. Her emotional seduction is breeding a flat out attack on Republicans, and I am uncomfortable with how often I hear these generalizations-in-the-form-of-attacks flow from her mouth. Just as much as Romney declares McCain as a sway from true conservatism, this is not true liberalism.
And Hillary and Barack are both self-declared activists for unconventional politics. Hey it's your decision to determine which one is the more effective activist. I determine: Barack.
And this is why he's our fuckin homeboy.
I admit, I do wish he was a woman.
But I also bet he's better in bed than Hillary.
And that's hot.
Ok, I think that's it, for now.