They [Strathclyde University researchers led by Prof. Tim Bedford] found that although most of the missions failed to meet their original objectives, they could still be seen as strategic successes because of unplanned or unforeseen consequences. Researchers noted that despite Columbus's failure to reach Asia, his planned destination, he did
(
Read more... )
Comments 5
I once convinced a deflated J that failure wasn't always bad as we wouldn't be together if our past relationships were entirely successful.
Reply
Reply
Mind you, if you're an Iranian, Dubya did good - he got rid of Saddam Hussein (permanently) and the Taliban (for a bit) and left the USA too militarily tied up to do anything else.
Reply
The way I hear it, Bush helped the Iranian theocrats in particular. I've also heard that latterly he thwarted Cheney's desires to bomb Iran, but I don't know how much truth there is in that.
Reply
Don't think he tried to reclaim it for us.
So Scottish though, that whole snatching defeat from the jaws of victory plus we would have to try the hardest part to colonise really. To think, we could be a global power...well we were...Gavin is about to go Brazil for 6th time and near Santos is what was the world's first moutain side scaling railway - built by Scots. And is was the Scots connected to that project who brought football to Brazil. I think. Although I also think perhaps Hibs were the first European side to go to Brazil.
Reply
Leave a comment