Lost, LOTR, Harry Potter. That narrows it down.

Apr 15, 2006 16:46

As to last Wednesday's "Lost," I have little to say, since they didn't advance the plot much until the last ten seconds. I heart Bernard and Rose, of course, and I'm glad the island did something good for her. But that Jack-and-Kate-smashed-together-in-a-net scene...what, were the writers trying to spark some NC17 Kate/Jack fanfic or something? Desperate ploy. We all know she and Sawyer make a more smokin' couple. So, next topic...

The TBS station is airing the three LOTR films this weekend. They've also been showing some funny promos for it, including a reel of Frodo falling down, another of Legolas and Aragorn as the "hunks" of Middle-Earth, and (of course) Frodo and Sam as secret lovers. (That one was almost too easy for 'em. Heck, they only had to use footage from the first film alone.) If, like me, you don't have cable, these promos can be viewed here. Thank you to narniadear for pointing that out! Btw, any way I can save them to my computer? I'm on a Mac for what that's worth.

And as to Harry Potter: I recently rewatched Prisoner of Azkaban, and have a question that I'm sure has only been asked a zillion times. Fred and George had the Marauder's Map for years, but it took Harry--or Lupin in the book, I think--to notice that some guy named Peter Pettigrew was on it, and always seemed to be in the exact location of Ron's rat? A little dense of the twins, considering they're Ron's brothers and probably spend plenty of time near him and his rat.

I'll stop there before I say anything else stupid, since I'm sure there's a good explanation. Ciao!

lord of the rings, harry potter, lost

Previous post Next post
Up