I posted this as a comment over at Anglachel's blog earlier, thought I'd repost it here (for a more positive take, see here:
http://www.taylormarsh.com/archives_view.php?id=27616) (from an electoral horse-race point of view, NC was about what I expected and Indiana
(
Read more... )
The whole thing sounds like the sort of stuff I've seen Obama supporters say when they claim Hillary's plan will force poor people to use their food/rent money to buy insurance, totally ignoring the sliding scale/subsidies for the very poor element of the payroll tax; I don't know what sort of bizarre misinformation is going on out there, but the spreading of this sort of thing is a huge reason I can't stand his campaign.
(sorry, but the coverage of this whole campaign and people's reaction to it has me the most upset I've been since 3/4 of the country was all gung ho about invading Iraq)
Reply
Personally, I am vehemently opposed to national health care. I don't think it will solve the problem of uninsured Americans. My solution would instead be to create sanctions against insurance companies and the like, much like we should be doing with big oil.
Reply
ITA w/you that chiropractic and other alternative medicines should be covered; the AMA and the medical & pharma companies are bad about trying to destroy all their competitors any way they can, including spreading and funding anti-alt (from chiropractic to tcm to herbal) propaganda.
Reply
Leave a comment