For the past year or so, I’ve been timing how long it takes for me to go through the checkouts at our grocery store to see which is faster.
The methodology is quite simple. Once I’ve got all my groceries, I go to the same spot near the checkouts. To avoid biasing myself, I check my cell phone to determine whether to go through the self checkouts or the normal checkouts. Because my cell phone lacks a random number generator, I check the last digit of the time: an even digit means I go through the normal checkout and an odd digit means I go through self checkout. I then start the stopwatch and time how long it takes for me to go through the checkout and leave the store.
I’ve got 31 data points and have finally decided that if one type of checkout is faster than the other, the difference is small enough to not really matter. Here’s the scatterplot:
A sample size of 31 is unimpressive, to be sure, but it’s large enough that I can finally rest easy knowing it would be a waste of time to collect more data. Trying to get out of the grocery store in the fastest way possible seems to have more important factors, such as the number of jerks ahead of you in line.
As a side note on how that scatterplot is presented, it probably would have made a lot more sense to measure the time taken as a function of how many items I bought, rather than the cash value of the items I bought. I’m far too lazy to count things, though.
So, from now on I’ll be deciding on self checkout versus normal checkout based on how social I’m feeling. I suspect that means I’ll be using the self checkout a lot.
Originally published at
Wizardlike research. You can comment here or
there.