what???
Scott credits the blueprint laid out by Johnson, who realized that to win in the court of public opinion, ID needed only to cast reasonable doubt on evolution. "He said, 'Don't get involved in details, don't get involved in fact claims,'" says Scott. "'Forget about the age of Earth, forget about the flood, don't mention the Bible.'" The goal, she says, is "to focus on the big idea that evolution is inadequate. Intelligent design doesn't really explain anything. It says that evolution can't explain things. Everything else is hand-waving."
read the entire ridiculous article here
i think it's sad that public opinion is used to achieve a greater goal that otherwise
could not be achieved. note, "Don't get involved in details..." and "Everything
else is hand-waving."
also, this is pretty interesting (but on a completely different note
http://www.pipa.org/OnlineReports/Pres_Election_04/Report09_08_04.pdf
http://www.pipa.org/OnlineReports/Iraq/Report08_20_04.pdf