Essay, letters
To what extent has the traditional male role changed in the last 20 years?
As all we know, male gender was main in society. Even 20 years ago men could get better job than female. Why that? The answer in history. Men were protectors, hunters. They more strong and no surprising why men on the top of society. Women prepared food and helped growing they childrens. But at second part of twenty century after gender revolution situation were changed. Women got new positions in politics, top managers, rescues, and even police positions. New word appear in our life. It politically correct. That's mean that no one can't said something abuse to other person about his/her gender, age, religion, skin colour and so on.
As for as I know, some moments of gender discriminations still present. Also we can see dominating male role in modern life. Less then before, but it still present. Governments around the world trying to protect women agains gender discrimination with new laws.
Today male role in modern society equality woman. I think this is right possition, because there is no diffirents beetwen people. But we should do more in this area. Gender discriminations laws must be more rigorous than know.
Also males preparing food, growing childs like women before. They even can get maternity leave at their work. Males now doing more female works than before and contrary womans find themselves at unusual for women area.
Many people believe that women make better parents than men and that this is why they have the greater role in raising children in most societies. Others claim that men are just as good as women at parenting Write an essay expressing your point of view. Give reasons for your answer.
First of all let's find out why women better parents in peoples mind than men at historical point of view. At the cave time men were hunters. They always were outside of the caves where women raised their children. Later always were different wars and men were warriors, so children raising burden has been at womens shoulders. All the times men were family protectors and breadwinners and women were nannys. That's why people think that women better parents than men.
Positive side is relationship between mother and child. Babes always closer to theirs mother after birth. And breast feeding good for babys health that father can't give to his child. And also women after delivery should restore their health, so they can't do hard job and babes raising role is the best for them at that period.
Another claim that men can be wondeful parents for children after their birth and older age. They can't give breast feedend but they can feed another products whitch not worse than breast feeding. Mens can give more discipline than women. Father always can protect his child better than mother because men are stronger.
My opinion is both of men and women can be a great parents if they love their children. More often men don't care to his children than women. This is another one reason why women better parents. But no matter who you are, love is main in raising children.
Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves?
Such are the today's international situation is a lot of poor countries where people have't even slice of bread. Mostly there is africans, south americans and some easter europes countries. Unfortunately, these countries governments is corrupt and they didn't nothing to fix this problem. A lot of people at these countries is very reach, but most of them is very poor. One of the main problem is corruption.
A lot of rech countries, such a USA, Canada and most of Europinian countries helps poorer countries. Also we all know "Red cross" organization. They helps a lot to poor countries. Their help is 'address' help. And that because they saved a lot of peoples life.
But unfortunately most of these money sent to poor countries is stealing by countries administrations. People don't feel any help. Reach countries spend a lot of money without any reason. They can't control poor countries government work. And poor people becomes poorer, reach people becomes reacher.
I think that only internal revolution can help. And we all can see that around the world: Egypt, Iran revolutions. Reach countries can help at these revolutions, they can help people to change their government.
In conclusion I want to say that help is good, but people must solve their problems themself. Money and foodit is not way out. Poor countries must change all their administrations.
What should a government do for a country to become successful?
All countries governments work around the world is trying to do everything possible to become they successful. Governments exist for regulation peoples society life. They are controlling law, health, education sphere. If the government is succes all people life can be at much higher level than in less successful countries.
I think that government should investment their capital to the human resources development, especially to youth. They also should develop education first of all. The high educational people is the main power of country succsses.
Contrary, some capitals should be invested to buisness. Increase of quality inernals products for export is the way to country wealth.
Decrease of corruption is additional way to success. County can't be succsses if corruption level high. High educational governments members who are reach at starting they work in government can prevent corruption in lower organizations. Strict law must be implement. China for examle has very strickt law. In case of corruptuion is death penalty. So as we can see China's corruption level is low. Contrary in Ukraine where law is very liberal coruption level is the one highest in the world.
In conclusion, high level education with patriotic feeling amontg young people, high buisness level, low corruption and strict law is the way for country successful.
Should money be spent on space exploration?
The year 1961 is the year of space epoch for all humaity. This is when Soviet astronut Juri Gagarin first went into the space. This was a time of "cold" war between Soviet Union and USA. A lot of money were spent for new space technologies to become first at that field. In 1969 american astronaut Neel Armstrong landed on the surface of the Moon. This incredible step gave push for a lot of new technicals discovers. But some years later, space programs both of that countries are slowed down. The reason is ended of Soviet Union and as a result finished "cold" war and some economical problems around the world.
I think that space exploration is the way to humanity success in future. A lot of new discovers happening while space explorations. A lot of new knowleges we can find in space. Thanks to space programs we have know mobile phones, internet, navigation systems, cable TV and many more. This is right way for wealth countries to investment money to their space programs. Maybe this is not main aim, but after economical, health, education, military investments, space programs should be paid maximum is that possible.
All we know that our planet is not everlasting. Sun become colder, global warming on Earth, ozone become thinner, population on our planet become bigger so as result food and water become less from year to year. Scientist says that some similar planet like Earth can be exist in our galaxy. With space exploration we have a chance to find this planet and colonize it.
In conclusion, space exploration should be one of the main aim the wealth countries. We should investing a lot of money for technical education for young people. We have a lot of lawyers, economists, buisinessmans but we haven't technical specialists a lot as we need. We should change this situasion with some stimulation government youth programs and a lot of investitions.
Should rich countries forgive all debts for poor countries?
A lot of countries around the world need some help from wealthy countries. They often asking some money from reach countries to stimulating their economy, solve some internal problems. Usually their resources is not enough to grow their economy to high level and this is why they asking some help outside.
But at another hand we know a lot of countries with poor resources but they richer than most of another countries. For example Israel. They have only desert and not enough of water. But we can see Israel exporting a lot of fruits, vegetables. Where they can get it in the desert? The answer is droping system which pouring fruits ang vegetables with a little of water. Another example is Japan. They haven't resources too but their resources is human brain. Their technologies is one of the best around the world and they have a lot of factorys.
One of the wealthy countries - USA have a huge dept. Billions of dollars. It also stimulating their economy despite powerful resources.
I think all debts should be returned as soon as it possible because that countries who took help or can return it because they have a strong economy and this help need only for solve some mission, or government of these countries just steal it and people doesn't get this help. It should be a strongly controlling from countries who give help. Forgiving depts can't stimulating countries to growing up. They always asking for helps and they always hope that this help will be forgiven. So they don't want do something for stimulation their economy anh help their people to become rich. It must be non money help but new technologies, educational, health help.
In conclusion, some help need to solve immidiately problems, some help need to stimulating economy. This help should be returned. Instead for some categories of countries need another help like education their young people who can use their brain to grow up theur countries in a future.
Should rich countries pay more for environmental damage?
Last 30 years vehicles were doble around the world. Despite new high technolodies, ecological engines quantity of the exhaust is rising up day by day. Also a lot of factories is another reason of bad ecology. And if country is rich, it has a lot of cars, trucks, airplanes and factories. Today people can buy two or even three cars at family. They also traveling a lot. Typical person driving about 20000 km per year by his car. This is a huge of petrols were burned.
I think that rich countries should invest their money to new ecological engines development. We can see now a lot of young people who create new types of engines. This is electrical, solar and even hydrogen engines. Governments of the rich countries should stimulating them to new developments.
But, unfortunately, we have a lot problems with it. First of all we do not have any infrastructure for that. For example is electrical or hydrogen stations. Also gas business is very strong and businessmens don't want new non-gas technologies because they will all bankrupts soon. Just countries can't invest all this projects. They need rich investors. But know they are not enough.
Also they must build recycling factories. A tons of plastic bottles throwing out every day. This is one of the terrible thing for the ecology. They should also help poor countries to build these factories.
In conclusion, rich countries should pay not for environmental damage, but they must pay for new technologies to prevent this environmental damage. The main aim for all countries around the world is solve a lot of ecological problems. They must unit whith each other for our childrens future.
Are our zoos cruel to wild animals?
Nowadays every big city has a zoo. It's a thousands wild animals in prison around a world. We can find there animals from whole world: from Africa to Noth Pole, form Asia to America. And this animals should live in different climatic zones different to they own. New technologies can create their climate in a small zone that helps animals feel comfortable.
In one hand, this is perfect places to rest for people all ages: from childrens to older people. Most of zoos is a huge green parks with animals. So microclimate in these zoo-parks is very nice for big cities. It can help people who live in a big cities find some fresh air but not exhaust. Also many peoples can see these animals only in the books or at the TV. In zoos they can see animals alive. It's very funny and educational for childrens.
In another hand, this is cruel to wild animals because they live in a small places, they moving not enough and they are in a poor health. They must hunting themself for their health but instead that they get food without any moving. And this is big stress for wild animals to start live in a zoos. Their lifetime shorter in zoos than at the nature.
I think that zoos should exist in a cities but only if keeping at the high international zoo standarts level that prevent animals poor health and stress.
In conclusion, humans should be care to animals. They are ours friend and they helps in a lot areas of our life. So, if we want to see wild animals in the cities, we should be gently with them.
Letter
Informing an Airline
Dear Sir/Madam,
At June 22-th 2011 I flew from New-York with your airline company airplane (copy of my ticket added).
Unfortunately I have forgotten my cabin bag in the box over my seat in the plane I flew. It's a middle-size "Adidas" black sport bag with three white strips on one side. It has one big pocket on different white stripes side. Also there is keychain as 'Mickey Mouse' on the zipper.
Inside of my bag contains white t-short without any prints, 'Man's Health' magazin, Ipod music player, "Polaroid" sun glasses,empty bottle of coca-cola and my wife's picture.
Please, inform me if you will find my bag. My phone number in Paris is 243-53-64.
I hope you'll help to solve this problem.
Your faithfully,
Nikita Marushkevich.
As all we know, male gender was main in society. Even 20 years ago men could get better job than female. Why that? The answer in history. Men were protectors, hunters. They more strong and no surprising why men on the top of society. Women prepared food and helped growing they childrens. But at second part of twenty century after gender revolution situation were changed. Women got new positions in politics, top managers, rescues, and even police positions. New word appear in our life. It politically correct. That's mean that no one can't said something abuse to other person about his/her gender, age, religion, skin colour and so on.
As for as I know, some moments of gender discriminations still present. Also we can see dominating male role in modern life. Less then before, but it still present. Governments around the world trying to protect women agains gender discrimination with new laws.
Today male role in modern society equality woman. I think this is right possition, because there is no diffirents beetwen people. But we should do more in this area. Gender discriminations laws must be more rigorous than know.
Also males preparing food, growing childs like women before. They even can get maternity leave at their work. Males now doing more female works than before and contrary womans find themselves at unusual for women area.
Many people believe that women make better parents than men and that this is why they have the greater role in raising children in most societies. Others claim that men are just as good as women at parenting Write an essay expressing your point of view. Give reasons for your answer.
First of all let's find out why women better parents in peoples mind than men at historical point of view. At the cave time men were hunters. They always were outside of the caves where women raised their children. Later always were different wars and men were warriors, so children raising burden has been at womens shoulders. All the times men were family protectors and breadwinners and women were nannys. That's why people think that women better parents than men.
Positive side is relationship between mother and child. Babes always closer to theirs mother after birth. And breast feeding good for babys health that father can't give to his child. And also women after delivery should restore their health, so they can't do hard job and babes raising role is the best for them at that period.
Another claim that men can be wondeful parents for children after their birth and older age. They can't give breast feedend but they can feed another products whitch not worse than breast feeding. Mens can give more discipline than women. Father always can protect his child better than mother because men are stronger.
My opinion is both of men and women can be a great parents if they love their children. More often men don't care to his children than women. This is another one reason why women better parents. But no matter who you are, love is main in raising children.
Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves?
Such are the today's international situation is a lot of poor countries where people have't even slice of bread. Mostly there is africans, south americans and some easter europes countries. Unfortunately, these countries governments is corrupt and they didn't nothing to fix this problem. A lot of people at these countries is very reach, but most of them is very poor. One of the main problem is corruption.
A lot of rech countries, such a USA, Canada and most of Europinian countries helps poorer countries. Also we all know "Red cross" organization. They helps a lot to poor countries. Their help is 'address' help. And that because they saved a lot of peoples life.
But unfortunately most of these money sent to poor countries is stealing by countries administrations. People don't feel any help. Reach countries spend a lot of money without any reason. They can't control poor countries government work. And poor people becomes poorer, reach people becomes reacher.
I think that only internal revolution can help. And we all can see that around the world: Egypt, Iran revolutions. Reach countries can help at these revolutions, they can help people to change their government.
In conclusion I want to say that help is good, but people must solve their problems themself. Money and foodit is not way out. Poor countries must change all their administrations.
What should a government do for a country to become successful?
All countries governments work around the world is trying to do everything possible to become they successful. Governments exist for regulation peoples society life. They are controlling law, health, education sphere. If the government is succes all people life can be at much higher level than in less successful countries.
I think that government should investment their capital to the human resources development, especially to youth. They also should develop education first of all. The high educational people is the main power of country succsses.
Contrary, some capitals should be invested to buisness. Increase of quality inernals products for export is the way to country wealth.
Decrease of corruption is additional way to success. County can't be succsses if corruption level high. High educational governments members who are reach at starting they work in government can prevent corruption in lower organizations. Strict law must be implement. China for examle has very strickt law. In case of corruptuion is death penalty. So as we can see China's corruption level is low. Contrary in Ukraine where law is very liberal coruption level is the one highest in the world.
In conclusion, high level education with patriotic feeling amontg young people, high buisness level, low corruption and strict law is the way for country successful.
Should money be spent on space exploration?
The year 1961 is the year of space epoch for all humaity. This is when Soviet astronut Juri Gagarin first went into the space. This was a time of "cold" war between Soviet Union and USA. A lot of money were spent for new space technologies to become first at that field. In 1969 american astronaut Neel Armstrong landed on the surface of the Moon. This incredible step gave push for a lot of new technicals discovers. But some years later, space programs both of that countries are slowed down. The reason is ended of Soviet Union and as a result finished "cold" war and some economical problems around the world.
I think that space exploration is the way to humanity success in future. A lot of new discovers happening while space explorations. A lot of new knowleges we can find in space. Thanks to space programs we have know mobile phones, internet, navigation systems, cable TV and many more. This is right way for wealth countries to investment money to their space programs. Maybe this is not main aim, but after economical, health, education, military investments, space programs should be paid maximum is that possible.
All we know that our planet is not everlasting. Sun become colder, global warming on Earth, ozone become thinner, population on our planet become bigger so as result food and water become less from year to year. Scientist says that some similar planet like Earth can be exist in our galaxy. With space exploration we have a chance to find this planet and colonize it.
In conclusion, space exploration should be one of the main aim the wealth countries. We should investing a lot of money for technical education for young people. We have a lot of lawyers, economists, buisinessmans but we haven't technical specialists a lot as we need. We should change this situasion with some stimulation government youth programs and a lot of investitions.
Should rich countries forgive all debts for poor countries?
A lot of countries around the world need some help from wealthy countries. They often asking some money from reach countries to stimulating their economy, solve some internal problems. Usually their resources is not enough to grow their economy to high level and this is why they asking some help outside.
But at another hand we know a lot of countries with poor resources but they richer than most of another countries. For example Israel. They have only desert and not enough of water. But we can see Israel exporting a lot of fruits, vegetables. Where they can get it in the desert? The answer is droping system which pouring fruits ang vegetables with a little of water. Another example is Japan. They haven't resources too but their resources is human brain. Their technologies is one of the best around the world and they have a lot of factorys.
One of the wealthy countries - USA have a huge dept. Billions of dollars. It also stimulating their economy despite powerful resources.
I think all debts should be returned as soon as it possible because that countries who took help or can return it because they have a strong economy and this help need only for solve some mission, or government of these countries just steal it and people doesn't get this help. It should be a strongly controlling from countries who give help. Forgiving depts can't stimulating countries to growing up. They always asking for helps and they always hope that this help will be forgiven. So they don't want do something for stimulation their economy anh help their people to become rich. It must be non money help but new technologies, educational, health help.
In conclusion, some help need to solve immidiately problems, some help need to stimulating economy. This help should be returned. Instead for some categories of countries need another help like education their young people who can use their brain to grow up theur countries in a future.
Should rich countries pay more for environmental damage?
Last 30 years vehicles were doble around the world. Despite new high technolodies, ecological engines quantity of the exhaust is rising up day by day. Also a lot of factories is another reason of bad ecology. And if country is rich, it has a lot of cars, trucks, airplanes and factories. Today people can buy two or even three cars at family. They also traveling a lot. Typical person driving about 20000 km per year by his car. This is a huge of petrols were burned.
I think that rich countries should invest their money to new ecological engines development. We can see now a lot of young people who create new types of engines. This is electrical, solar and even hydrogen engines. Governments of the rich countries should stimulating them to new developments.
But, unfortunately, we have a lot problems with it. First of all we do not have any infrastructure for that. For example is electrical or hydrogen stations. Also gas business is very strong and businessmens don't want new non-gas technologies because they will all bankrupts soon. Just countries can't invest all this projects. They need rich investors. But know they are not enough.
Also they must build recycling factories. A tons of plastic bottles throwing out every day. This is one of the terrible thing for the ecology. They should also help poor countries to build these factories.
In conclusion, rich countries should pay not for environmental damage, but they must pay for new technologies to prevent this environmental damage. The main aim for all countries around the world is solve a lot of ecological problems. They must unit whith each other for our childrens future.
Are our zoos cruel to wild animals?
Nowadays every big city has a zoo. It's a thousands wild animals in prison around a world. We can find there animals from whole world: from Africa to Noth Pole, form Asia to America. And this animals should live in different climatic zones different to they own. New technologies can create their climate in a small zone that helps animals feel comfortable.
In one hand, this is perfect places to rest for people all ages: from childrens to older people. Most of zoos is a huge green parks with animals. So microclimate in these zoo-parks is very nice for big cities. It can help people who live in a big cities find some fresh air but not exhaust. Also many peoples can see these animals only in the books or at the TV. In zoos they can see animals alive. It's very funny and educational for childrens.
In another hand, this is cruel to wild animals because they live in a small places, they moving not enough and they are in a poor health. They must hunting themself for their health but instead that they get food without any moving. And this is big stress for wild animals to start live in a zoos. Their lifetime shorter in zoos than at the nature.
I think that zoos should exist in a cities but only if keeping at the high international zoo standarts level that prevent animals poor health and stress.
In conclusion, humans should be care to animals. They are ours friend and they helps in a lot areas of our life. So, if we want to see wild animals in the cities, we should be gently with them.
Letter
Informing an Airline
Dear Sir/Madam,
At June 22-th 2011 I flew from New-York with your airline company airplane (copy of my ticket added).
Unfortunately I have forgotten my cabin bag in the box over my seat in the plane I flew. It's a middle-size "Adidas" black sport bag with three white strips on one side. It has one big pocket on different white stripes side. Also there is keychain as 'Mickey Mouse' on the zipper.
Inside of my bag contains white t-short without any prints, 'Man's Health' magazin, Ipod music player, "Polaroid" sun glasses,empty bottle of coca-cola and my wife's picture.
Please, inform me if you will find my bag. My phone number in Paris is 243-53-64.
I hope you'll help to solve this problem.
Your faithfully,
Nikita Marushkevich.