Changing track...

May 05, 2004 03:44

(x-posted to _scientists_All right, I'm heading towards being a physics/astronomy major at the University of Pittsburgh. Thing is, I had two semesters of high school physics that were taught by an awful teacher, and therefore I have a very small background in physics. Because I really don't want to struggle through calc-based physics next semester, I'm looking ( Read more... )

physics

Leave a comment

oldschoolnewave May 8 2004, 19:29:41 UTC
Hey you, I found you on _scientists_ and figured I would add you because we are very similar ;) I'm also a Physics - Astronomy major here in Orlando and am getting started.

I was in your same position a year ago having an awful Physics high school teacher and being worried that I would be so lost in the first university classes. Fortunately I was wrong and they were pretty easy (Calculus II on the other hand....).

Anyway, look over stuff if you want, but don't stress. The classes will be taught as if you've never heard of the things before. Having even a general background is just a bonus!

Reply

mmejavert May 8 2004, 20:20:07 UTC
That's definitely a relief to know! I keep hearing this, oh, it'll be easy... but I found I accidentally signed up for the more difficult physics sequence. Not that I really mind, because more difficult is usually more interesting. But I have a GPA to boost, and besides, I love physics. :)

And I shall add you right back!

Reply

oldschoolnewave May 9 2004, 12:28:46 UTC
Well you'd probably be required to take the more difficult one anyway, no? Its required here at least, although the only difference in difficulty really is one uses Calculus and the other doesn't (although honestly we barely used in Calc in my class ( ... )

Reply

mmejavert May 10 2004, 18:51:50 UTC
Yeah. Actually my major is just physics with an astronomy "flavour." The university only offers about eight astronomy classes -- four of which are gen. ed. and won't count towards my major if I took them. Basically the physics/astronomy major at Pitt takes the physics major and replaces four physics courses with the four astro ones. I have to take something like 11-13 physics courses.

Three of the four astronomy classes I have to take are only offered every six semesters (including summer terms). Two of them are offered this coming year so I won't be able to take them until my senior year. Intro astronomy is offered just every fall (used to be every fall/spring). Which only goes to show that there's few teachers and even fewer interest.

I don't have to take quantum mechanics, because I'm not doing the honours degree but I think I'll take it anyway, 'cause quantum's pretty damn cool. :)

Reply

oldschoolnewave May 10 2004, 18:59:23 UTC
Now see that is pretty cool....here everybody has to take the core Physics classes, including a year of Quantum and a year of Electricity and Magnatism (both of which I've heard nothing but horror stories about, so I am extremely worried). Then you get to pick from a specializiation area, which is where Astronomy comes in.

Like I said I am just worried about QM and EM...if I can't pass those I am going to end up with a minor in Physics, Astronomy and Math, and thats about it :(

Reply

mmejavert May 10 2004, 19:06:58 UTC
ugh.. electricity and magnetism. I can honestly say that, when I was trying to study (independently) for the AP Physics B test, that section of the book was the least comprehensible to me. I have to take one of those classes too. (Here Intro Quantum is a two-semester course.) Wave motion and optics and Mechanics and all sorts of physics things. I can add a Thermodynamics class but I don't know how much I want to overload myself, heh.

Reply

oldschoolnewave May 10 2004, 19:32:29 UTC
Yep, QM is a year here too...so is EM. Then I think I take a Thermo class, Mechanics, a few cool labs, Statistical Physics and thats about it really. I was disappointed my school offers no relativity or anything.

Really I am just trying to take QM and EM asap so that I can see if its something I am going to be able to handle or something crazy.

Reply

mmejavert May 10 2004, 19:42:42 UTC
Heh. If you get to it before I do, let me know how it goes! ;-)

Personally, I'm looking forward to Quantum and Galaxies & Cosmology my self... I figure since Thermo is optional for me, I'll wait and see if there's room for it my senior year, or just take it my fifth year if there's nothing better to do.

Reply

oldschoolnewave May 10 2004, 20:03:35 UTC
I am curious how difficult the non-intro Astronomy classes are. Here the only prereqs are Intro to Ast and basic physics, so I don't think there is going to be much physisc or calc. This fall I might be taking Solar System Astronomy, which is described as "Interdisciplinary approach to the dynamics of the Solar System through application of Physics, Atmospheric Science, Chemistry and Geology."

The problem, at least here, with a Physics degree, is that almost all the higher level stuff requires Diff Equations, which I won't be taking till the spring at the earliest. And right now, I've almost run out of classes to take until then!

Reply

mmejavert May 10 2004, 22:42:25 UTC
Have to take Diff Equations anyway. Calc I, II, III, then Diff. I was also advised to take Partial Diff. after that, if I've got the time/energy. Figure it'd be useful, really. I'm... really not the world's best math student, but hey. I'm up for a challenge. :)

Reply

mrfishes May 10 2004, 16:04:28 UTC
calc 2 sucks ass badly. definitely the sort of course to take at a community college if you can, unless your CC is like my CC and is stuffed with university reject professors who don't speak english much better than the stereotypical university TA. . . (my linear algebra teacher at WCC in Ann Arbor was a little old Korean man who spoke English well enough one-to-one, but in class spoke both a bit too softly and with a strong enough accent he was occasionally unintelligible, let alone learn-from-able. . . . my calc II teacher wasn't much better, plus the fact that he just couldn't teach.

Reply

mmejavert May 10 2004, 18:54:44 UTC
Was told not to take any of my major courses anyplace but Pitt. Especially my calc classes. Especially since Calc II is part of a sequence; advisor-man says it's better to take all courses in a sequence in the same place so's you don't get all verhuddled. ;-)

Reply

oldschoolnewave May 10 2004, 19:02:33 UTC
Yeah, a lot of people seem to have trouble with it. I just got through failing it...had a very difficult old German man as a professor. He knew his material, but he was a very hard grader. About 30% of the class got a passing grade. Today was my first day with a new teacher, a very nice Russian lady, so I am really hoping it goes well as!

Reply


Leave a comment

Up