Comments | mlfoley: IS BARBARA BUSH ACTUALLY THE DAUGHTER OF ALEISTER CROWLEY?!

mlfoley

IS BARBARA BUSH ACTUALLY THE DAUGHTER OF ALEISTER CROWLEY?!

Nov 20, 2007 20:14

Decide for yourselfTwo things jump immediately to mind - first: associating Crowley DNA with the Bush family is incredibly insulting to Crowley. He may have been The Wickedest Man in the World, but he was no Bush. Second: Wow, from associating with Crowley to associating with fundies and Rudy in two generations? A perfect example of devolution ( Read more... )

fucking meat in meat lockers, what the fuck, pollyticks

Comments 5

semyaza November 21 2007, 02:13:14 UTC

There's quite a resemblance. I've never believed in devolution but that's a powerful argument for it.

mlfoley November 21 2007, 02:24:24 UTC

I refuse to believe it. I refuse to see the resemblance. Crowley is not associated with the Bush family. It's unpossible!

adunaphel November 21 2007, 02:31:00 UTC

I dunno. I could totally see Dubya in that coat and top hat.

mlfoley November 21 2007, 02:35:05 UTC

Crowley is much too good and noble a man to ever be involved with the Bush family. It's not possible.

(The comment has been removed)

mlfoley November 21 2007, 04:00:56 UTC

Agreed totally.

But then there are all of those people who think that the Bushes are involved in Satanic pedophile rings (not evil enough for them, I say). Maybe that's where the Crowley connection comes from.