it means nothing.

Apr 08, 2014 09:50


The fact that I have created a Scrivener file for the PADYA (Post Apocalyptic Dystopian Young Adult) novel means nothing.

The fact that I spent an hour and a half pounding out a gibberish-filled rough draft synopsis last night also means nothing.

The fact that I’m looking with some interest at time-tracking software does mean something, but that’s ( Read more... )

writing, metrics

Leave a comment

Comments 9

chrysoula April 8 2014, 17:08:18 UTC
Toggl looks interesting. Mind, it makes me wish I could bill for household chores and helping my children put their pants on.

Reply


pameladean April 8 2014, 20:28:35 UTC
Hee. I put in all the descriptions in the first draft, but end up leaving out part of the plot. Your way seems more reasonable, but process mostly isn't reasonable.

P.

Reply

mizkit April 8 2014, 20:35:45 UTC
*laughs* I've never skipped the descriptions so thoroughly as I did in this one. The entire manuscript is full of NOTE: DESCRIPTY DESCRIPTY DESCRIPT and things like that. It's going to take ages to fill in. :)

Reply

pameladean April 8 2014, 20:37:43 UTC
Well, I can certainly see that it would speed things up, but my going-forward method is so weird that with no description I would never get anywhere.

P.

Reply

mizkit April 8 2014, 20:49:58 UTC
In this particular case it was relatively easy to skip because it's all Regency costuming/decorating and I didn't have access to the internet while I was working and I don't have enough native knowledge (yet) to invent things. Usually I wouldn't be able to do it so ruthlessly. But you're a vastly more descriptive writer than I am, and I can see why it would be nearly impossible to move forward without the descriptions!

Reply


irishkate April 8 2014, 22:32:59 UTC
I am fascinated by the idea of leaving out the descriptions AND by the idea of having to create regency descriptions at all...

Reply


Leave a comment

Up