The ideal of a comic book is to tell a story so well wedded between words and pictures that it's incomplete without one of those aspects. More or less any comic book does that as a run of the mill storytelling aspect, with occasional forays into all-silent issues or, in Terry Moore's case, periodic breaks into actual prose when there's too much
(
Read more... )
Comments 14
I agree with the notion put forward by Eisner and McCloud (amongst others, but they made books about it) that the fundamental nature of comics is a deliberate sequence of images (yes, yes, Scott, juxtaposed so we're not including film here.) This is not to say that words aren't a perfectly legitimate part of the comics form, since they are, but I dispute that "words + pictures = comics."
And I come bearing new evidence! http://normallife.livejournal.com/81110.html
(Note that saying that comics don't necessarily need words doesn't mean that they don't need a writer. If all a writer did was make neat-sounding words...)
Reply
Reply
Reply
That's a nice way of putting it. Yeah. Like that. *pretends I said that* :)
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
I'm not quite as much of a JLA fanatic as a Superman fanatic; I only own about 400 JLA's as opposed to about 1600 Superman books. But I appreciated that every small section got the characterization right, even in sync with what the characters' attitudes towards each other were or would be at the time.
Now, if you're looking for another fine comic book, go out and get the latest Astro City special. Busiek, as always, does a fine job of capturing the best elements of the medium.
Reply
I haven't read any Astro City. I take it I should?
Reply
I'd loan you a copy, but the handoff would be a bit tricky.
Reply
Reply
Jim
Reply
Leave a comment