I see a lot of heat, but very little light.
Let's start with a disclaimer. I'm an anarchist. As such, the mechanism by which the parties divvie up power is primarily of academic interest to me. That said, I'll launch into the debate of "what colour do you think the wheel should be?" and ignore the shape. Why not
(
Read more... )
Reply
This sentence, I can agree with.
I can't argue with the rest: not because I agree, but for the same reasons I can't argue with Creationists.
Reply
Genuinely puzzled.
Reply
Without a shared frame of reference, debate is futile. It's not about religion, but talking to Creationists is the classic example:
-"Look, there are fossils here we can conclusively prove are more than 4000 years old."
-"Satan put them there to tempt us!"
...pointless to continue.
Similarly, as you say, any political discourse between us is doomed to furrowed brows:
-"Would AV actually produce more representative government?"
-"An Empire in North Africa would give Europe free power!"
I can't adequately explain to you, in a way you'd understand, all that's wrong with that. And the fact that I'd need to makes it similarly pointless to continue.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment