(no subject)

Jul 10, 2007 17:51

I don't think I want to consistently wake up confused and unsure of where I am or what I did the night before, left to get my shit together in the morning; nor do I want to come home right before or even right after daybreak all that often, either. Dare I say also that I do not wish to partake in the scenarios that lead to these derivatives, quite often and quite directly, however not necessarily.

This has crossed my mind before, and yet I continue to place myself in such predicaments.

Perhaps I seek that sense of such an afterglow being worth it, in which case it's not so much an afterglow as it is an extension of an incredible experience.

We're all forced by circumstance to interact with people we would rather not. Conversely, we're constipated by circumstance to cease seeing those we actually enjoy spending time with. In other words, are there not folks you quite frankly dislike or find rather dull, predictable, or stupid, but have to be with at work or school or whatever else you do regularly? And furthermore, does what you do regularly not hold you back from keeping in touch with people you do indeed like? Is this beyond one's control? Shouldn't you then change what you do in order to make time for what you want to do and who you want to see?

Or does it just not mean enough to you?

A teacher once told me that to be apathetic is pathetic. I haven't really thought about it. This is the same one that said only boring people get bored, and the same one that inspired the three murals on which I worked for two years.

I just caught myself wishing that the average person had a longer attention span, because I'd like them to actually read my journals that I put out there to the public. Alas, I must be writing something important to me.
Previous post Next post
Up