(no subject)
WASHINGTON - In a surprising turnaround, federal health advisers Wednesday recommended allowing silicone-gel breast implants to return to the U.S. market after a 13-year near-ban - but only under strict conditions that will limit how easily women can get them.
AP Photo
AFP
Slideshow: FDA Debates Safety of Implants
Related Quotes MNT
DJIA
NASDAQ
S&P 500
35.33
10403.93
1974.37
1173.79
+0.77
-104.04
-31.03
-13.97
Yahoo! Health Have questions about your health?
Find answers here.
Mentor Corp. persuaded advisers to the Food and Drug Administration that its newer silicone implants are reasonably safe and more durable than older versions. The 7-2 vote came just one day after a rival manufacturer failed to satisfy lingering concerns about how often the implants break apart and leak inside women's bodies.
On Wednesday, FDA's advisers said Mentor had performed more convincing research that the implants only rarely break in the first few years after they're inserted, and some data that they may last as long as 10 years.
But they stressed that sales should resume only if Mentor meets some strict conditions:
_Prospective patients must sign consent forms acknowledging that the implants ultimately may break and require removal or replacement.
_Mentor may sell silicone implants only to board-certified plastic surgeons who complete special hands-on training to insert implants in a way that minimizes odds of breakage.
_Mentor must open a registry to track how patients fare long-term, and it must continue more formal studies to nail down how often implants rupture within 10 years, something no one yet knows.
Because implant breaks don't cause immediate symptoms, patients should get an MRI scan five years after their implant is inserted and every year or two thereafter - and have broken implants removed to minimize risk of silicone oozing into the breast, or beyond.
"Patients can determine whether or not for them it is worth it to have a device that might need to be replaced within a 10-year period of time," said FDA adviser Dr. Marilyn Leitch, a cancer surgeon at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center who supported Mentor sales.
Who in their right mind would have the implants put in them knowing that they would break in 5-10 years? Why would the FDA allow the implants to be used, also knowing this information? How much money did Mentor Corp. pay the FDA?!!!!! I cannot believe this