Can you read this? Only 55 people on LiveJournal can.
FIRST OF ALL:
--------------
I cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I wuas rdanieg.
The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it dseno't mtaetr in waht oerdr the ltteres in a wrod are, the olny iproamtnt tihng is taht the frsit and lsat ltteer are in the rghit pclae.
Thhe rset can be a taotl mses and yhou can sitll raed it whotuit a pboerlm. Tihs is bcuseae the huuamn mnid deos
not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Azanmig huh? Yaeh and I awlyas tghuuhot slpeling was ipmorantt! If you can raed tihs rpsoet it.
ONLY REPOST IF YOU COULD READ THE ABOVE. Please update the number at the header to include yourself.
---Two more things to read LOL---
SECOND CONTRIVANCE LOL
--------------------------
In a letter to THE ECONOMIST, M. J. Shields of Jarrow, England, points out that George Bernard Shaw, among others, urged spelling reform, suggesting that one letter be altered or deleted each year, thus giving the populace time to absorb the change. Shields writes:
For example, in Year 1, that usless letter “c” would be dropped to be replased by either “k” or “s’, and likewise, “x” would no longer be part of the alphabet. The only kase in which “c” would be retained would be the “ch” formation, which will be dealt with later. Year 2 might well reform “w” spelling, so that “which” and “one” would take the same konsonant, wile Year 3 might well abolish “y” replasing it with “I”, and Iear 4 might fiks the “g-j” anomali wonse and for all.
Jenerally, then, the improvement would kontinue iear bai iear, with Iear 5 doing awai with useless double konsonants, and Iears 6-12 or so modifaiing vowlz and the rimeining voist and unvoist konsonants. Bai Ier 15 or sou, it wud fainali bi posibl tu meik ius ov thi redandant letez “c”, “y”, and “x” - bai now jast a memori in the maindz ov ould doderez - to replais “ch”, “sh”, and “th” rispektivili.
Fainali, xen, aafte sam 20 iers ov orxogrefkl riform, wi wud hav a lojikl, kohirnt speling in ius xrewawt xe Ingliy-spiking werld. Haweve, sins xe Wely, xe Airiy, and xe Skots du not spik Ingliy, xei wud hev to hev a speling siutd tu xer oun lengwij. Xei kud, haweve, orlweiz lern Ingliy az a sekond lengwij et skuul!
Iorz feixfuli,
M. J. Yilz.
I think it's really not bad^^ Should introduce *khmkhm*
AND THE THIRD ONE
-------------------
Áj bilív in dö mednesz kold "Náo"
Pászt en fjucsör prizn máj hárt
Tájm iz blájnd
Bád áj wáná trész máj láv
on dö voll of tájm, ovör péjn in máj hárt
Árt of lájf
Inszén bléd stebbin drímsz
Tráj to brék oll trusz náo
Bád áj kent híl disz bróken hárt in péjn
Kenot sztárt to lív, kenot end máj lájf
Kíp on crájn
Can you guess what was it???? ^O^ If you can, plz do the same with your own language, I am so curious^^
--------------
I cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I wuas rdanieg.
The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it dseno't mtaetr in waht oerdr the ltteres in a wrod are, the olny iproamtnt tihng is taht the frsit and lsat ltteer are in the rghit pclae.
Thhe rset can be a taotl mses and yhou can sitll raed it whotuit a pboerlm. Tihs is bcuseae the huuamn mnid deos
not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Azanmig huh? Yaeh and I awlyas tghuuhot slpeling was ipmorantt! If you can raed tihs rpsoet it.
ONLY REPOST IF YOU COULD READ THE ABOVE. Please update the number at the header to include yourself.
---Two more things to read LOL---
SECOND CONTRIVANCE LOL
--------------------------
In a letter to THE ECONOMIST, M. J. Shields of Jarrow, England, points out that George Bernard Shaw, among others, urged spelling reform, suggesting that one letter be altered or deleted each year, thus giving the populace time to absorb the change. Shields writes:
For example, in Year 1, that usless letter “c” would be dropped to be replased by either “k” or “s’, and likewise, “x” would no longer be part of the alphabet. The only kase in which “c” would be retained would be the “ch” formation, which will be dealt with later. Year 2 might well reform “w” spelling, so that “which” and “one” would take the same konsonant, wile Year 3 might well abolish “y” replasing it with “I”, and Iear 4 might fiks the “g-j” anomali wonse and for all.
Jenerally, then, the improvement would kontinue iear bai iear, with Iear 5 doing awai with useless double konsonants, and Iears 6-12 or so modifaiing vowlz and the rimeining voist and unvoist konsonants. Bai Ier 15 or sou, it wud fainali bi posibl tu meik ius ov thi redandant letez “c”, “y”, and “x” - bai now jast a memori in the maindz ov ould doderez - to replais “ch”, “sh”, and “th” rispektivili.
Fainali, xen, aafte sam 20 iers ov orxogrefkl riform, wi wud hav a lojikl, kohirnt speling in ius xrewawt xe Ingliy-spiking werld. Haweve, sins xe Wely, xe Airiy, and xe Skots du not spik Ingliy, xei wud hev to hev a speling siutd tu xer oun lengwij. Xei kud, haweve, orlweiz lern Ingliy az a sekond lengwij et skuul!
Iorz feixfuli,
M. J. Yilz.
I think it's really not bad^^ Should introduce *khmkhm*
AND THE THIRD ONE
-------------------
Áj bilív in dö mednesz kold "Náo"
Pászt en fjucsör prizn máj hárt
Tájm iz blájnd
Bád áj wáná trész máj láv
on dö voll of tájm, ovör péjn in máj hárt
Árt of lájf
Inszén bléd stebbin drímsz
Tráj to brék oll trusz náo
Bád áj kent híl disz bróken hárt in péjn
Kenot sztárt to lív, kenot end máj lájf
Kíp on crájn
Can you guess what was it???? ^O^ If you can, plz do the same with your own language, I am so curious^^