Why the Bailout Is Necessary
Tuesday September 23, 2008
Congress is now debating whether the taxpayer should pay $700 billion to bail out investment banks who purchased
mortgage-backed securities that are in danger of defaulting. The bailout was triggered by an event last week that shows just how close the global economy was (is?) to a catastrophic
(
Read more... )
Reply
Reply
For 16 years reformers in Congress have tried to improve oversight of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and prevent the government-chartered companies from putting the housing market and the whole economy at risk. All that time, Frank was involved in efforts to block those attempts, and in the last eight years he was a leader of those efforts.
Frank 'no crisis.' , The New York Times reported on Sept. 11, 2003:
''These two entities -- Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac -- are not facing any kind of financial crisis,'' said Representative Barney Frank of Massachusetts, the ranking Democrat on the Financial Services Committee. ''The more people exaggerate these problems, the more pressure there is on these companies, the less we will see in terms of affordable housing."
But there was a crisis, thanks in large part to Frank, Sen. Charles Schumer and others on the leash of these companies.
*Since 1989, Sen. Dodd has received $165,400 from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, more than any other Member of Congress.
In just four years, Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL) has received $126,349 from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, more than any Member of Congress except for Sen. Dodd.
Since 1989, Sen. John Kerry (D-MA) has received $111,000 from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
Since 1989, Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-NY) has received $76,050 from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
Since 1989, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) has received $56,250 from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
Since 1989, Rep. Frank has received $42,350 from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
Reply
I am concerned about what would/will happen if nothing is done. Part of me wants everything to fail, part of me doesn't think that would happen, and the other part is terrified of what would happen if it did.
Reply
Reply
Reply
At the same time we're tarring and feathering the CEOs.
Reply
Not electing them again would be a bright step.
Reply
Reply
We're seeing both sides load this baby down with special add on riders trying to force through various ideological gimmies they've struggled over for over a decade. A D can say "Hey, it went south because they won't cap executive pay." An R can say, "Hey, the deal went south because they won't give up cap gains taxes." Then the inevitable finger-pointing begins...while their voters are kept tickled pink by their ideological purity.
Reply
Reply
My habit of blasting PF every morning has long been neglected. Thanks for reminding me. :-)
Reply
Leave a comment