And the thank you goes to...
"Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life"
Since they so neatly organized which judges I don't want to vote for...
There are two things I don't want in my judges -
a) Freaky freaktastic religious zealotry.
b) Endorsements from the Pro-lifers.
Of my the four judicial match-ups on my ballot (incumbent first):
Alan C. Page vs. Tim Tingelstad. Yeah. Alan Page hands down, due to the fact his opponent fails condition a) in a big way. SCARY.
David Minge vs. Paul Elliot Ross. Mr Ross is a card carrying member of Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life. He fails b) - he IS a pro-lifer, also his biography tends to make me think he would fail a) as well.
R. A. (Jim) Randall vs. Daniel L. Griffith. The statement of support for this statement it is important for our judges to believe in God makes Mr. Griffith fail part a), plus he fails part b) as well.
Michael F. Fetsch vs. Patricia M. Sifferle. Seeing the statement I believe that all judges should administer the law and constitution objectively and impartially, without regard to their personal beliefs or convictions, and without regard to race, sex, religion, disability, or class status. on Ms. Sifferle's website... convinced me that she knows what judges are SUPPOSED to do. Plus, both people pass b) - I'm happy.
Since they so neatly organized which judges I don't want to vote for...
There are two things I don't want in my judges -
a) Freaky freaktastic religious zealotry.
b) Endorsements from the Pro-lifers.
Of my the four judicial match-ups on my ballot (incumbent first):
Alan C. Page vs. Tim Tingelstad. Yeah. Alan Page hands down, due to the fact his opponent fails condition a) in a big way. SCARY.
David Minge vs. Paul Elliot Ross. Mr Ross is a card carrying member of Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life. He fails b) - he IS a pro-lifer, also his biography tends to make me think he would fail a) as well.
R. A. (Jim) Randall vs. Daniel L. Griffith. The statement of support for this statement it is important for our judges to believe in God makes Mr. Griffith fail part a), plus he fails part b) as well.
Michael F. Fetsch vs. Patricia M. Sifferle. Seeing the statement I believe that all judges should administer the law and constitution objectively and impartially, without regard to their personal beliefs or convictions, and without regard to race, sex, religion, disability, or class status. on Ms. Sifferle's website... convinced me that she knows what judges are SUPPOSED to do. Plus, both people pass b) - I'm happy.