debunking

Jan 03, 2011 13:10

Jaclyn Friedman has done a debunking of the "Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Consequences of Enthusiastic Consent" in rebuttal to the trolls who have been arguing ridiculously that enthusiastic consent somehow encourages rape or is otherwise bad for women. Check it out here and obviously, trigger warning for in depth discussion of rape and rape apologism:
Similarly, when we learn as young girls to tolerate “low-level” boundary violations like the ones we often are forced to suffer in silence at school, at home and on the street - bra-snapping, boob-grabbing, ass pinching, catcalling, dick flashing “all in good fun” relentless violations that adults and authorities routinely ignore - it makes it harder for us to notice when even greater boundaries are being violated, eventually leading to the reality that many women who are raped just freeze and fall silent, because that’s what they’ve been taught to do over and over since day one. You tell me what’s more infantilizing: repeatedly letting boys (and grown men) off the hook for their behavior because “boys will be boys” and we can’t ever expect any differently, or creating a consent standard in which all partners take active responsibility for their partner’s safety, and which acknowledges the truly diseased sexual culture we’re soaking in every day.

This entry was originally posted to http://miera-c.dreamwidth.org/642141.html: Please comment there if you are willing

lmty

Previous post Next post
Up