Feb 09, 2006 14:52
We've looked up residency laws and talked to the lawyer in charge of our case.
good news: the letter we received was not legally an eviction notice; it was a request to
vacate. An eviction notice can only be delivered by a
court. So if we say no, they have to go through a bunch of legal
hoops and we can drag it out by contesting just about everything along
the way. Then when they actually give us an eviction notice, we
can say we've got no place to go and can get up to six months to look
for a new place. They want us out in two months, so we only need
to extend it another three before we'll be ready to move anyway.
but: we may need to hire a lawyer and that may cost more than we can
really afford to spend. If we say we can't afford to move, they
can't us out easily, but Ron has to keep trying to make payments so
that it doesn't ruin his credit and says they'll try to report him
anyway and he'll have to clean it up with a big hassle to fix his
credit again. If we do decide to move, it would benefit Remax to
place us with one of their other clients, and we may not have to pay
first and last months rent when we move in.
the lawyer said that the bank is not interested in being a landlord and
dealing with tenants, so they absolutely want the house emptied.
Ron told him that we only want to stay until august and will fight
eviction until then, so it's less of a headache for the bank just to
let us stay. He said he'll tell his clients that.
the main question is if we'll need a lawyer, how much it will cost, and if we can really afford to pay for it.