basically (of course, you could debate whether or not words like "prove" and "proposition" are purely mathematical)
The PATH of love is never SMOOTH, but mine's CONTINUOUS for you. You're the UPPER BOUND in the CHAINS of my heart. You're my AXIOM OF CHOICE -- you know it's true.
But lately our RELATION's not so WELL-DEFINED, and I just can't FUNCTION without you. I'll PROVE my PROPOSITION, and I'm sure you'll find we're a FINITE SIMPLE GROUP OF ORDER TWO.
I'm losing my IDENTITY. I'm getting TENSOR every day. And, WITHOUT LOSS OF GENERALITY, I will assume that you feel the same way.
Since every time I see you, you just QUOTIENT OUT the FAITHFUL IMAGE that i MAP INTO. But when we're ONE-TO-ONE, you'll see what I'm about, 'cause we're a FINITE SIMPLE GROUP OF ORDER TWO.
Our EQUIVALENCE was STABLE; a PRINCIPAL love BUNDLE sitting deep inside. But then, you drove a WEDGE between our 2-FORMS; now everything is so COMPLEXIFIED.
When we first met, we SIMPLY CONNECTED. My heart was OPEN, but too DENSE. Our SYSTEM was already DIRECTED to have a FINITE LIMIT in some sense.
I'm living in the KERNEL of a RANK-ONE MAP; from my DOMAIN, its IMAGE looks so blue, 'cause all I see are ZEROES -- it's a cruel trap, but we're a FINITE SIMPLE GROUP OF ORDER TWO.
I'm not the SMOOTHest OPERATOR in my CLASS, but we're a MIRROR PAIR, me and you. So let's apply FORGETFUL FUNCTORS to the past, and be a FINITE SIMPLE GROUP... Let's be a FINITE SIMPLE GROUP... Let's be a FINITE SIMPLE GROUP OF ORDER TWO. (Why not three?)
I've PROVED my PROPOSITION now, as you can see, so let's both be ASSOCIATIVE and FREE; and, by COROLLARY, this shows you and I to be PURELY INSEPERABLE, Q. E. D. (QED = quod erat demonstratum, or "which was to be proven," a phrase that Euclid used to signify the end of a proof, and is still in common use today)
(of course, you could debate whether or not words like "prove" and "proposition" are purely mathematical)
The PATH of love is never SMOOTH,
but mine's CONTINUOUS for you.
You're the UPPER BOUND in the CHAINS of my heart.
You're my AXIOM OF CHOICE -- you know it's true.
But lately our RELATION's not so WELL-DEFINED,
and I just can't FUNCTION without you.
I'll PROVE my PROPOSITION, and I'm sure you'll find
we're a FINITE SIMPLE GROUP OF ORDER TWO.
I'm losing my IDENTITY.
I'm getting TENSOR every day.
And, WITHOUT LOSS OF GENERALITY,
I will assume that you feel the same way.
Since every time I see you, you just QUOTIENT OUT
the FAITHFUL IMAGE that i MAP INTO.
But when we're ONE-TO-ONE, you'll see what I'm about,
'cause we're a FINITE SIMPLE GROUP OF ORDER TWO.
Our EQUIVALENCE was STABLE;
a PRINCIPAL love BUNDLE sitting deep inside.
But then, you drove a WEDGE between our 2-FORMS;
now everything is so COMPLEXIFIED.
When we first met, we SIMPLY CONNECTED.
My heart was OPEN, but too DENSE.
Our SYSTEM was already DIRECTED
to have a FINITE LIMIT in some sense.
I'm living in the KERNEL of a RANK-ONE MAP;
from my DOMAIN, its IMAGE looks so blue,
'cause all I see are ZEROES -- it's a cruel trap,
but we're a FINITE SIMPLE GROUP OF ORDER TWO.
I'm not the SMOOTHest OPERATOR in my CLASS,
but we're a MIRROR PAIR, me and you.
So let's apply FORGETFUL FUNCTORS to the past,
and be a FINITE SIMPLE GROUP...
Let's be a FINITE SIMPLE GROUP...
Let's be a FINITE SIMPLE GROUP OF ORDER TWO. (Why not three?)
I've PROVED my PROPOSITION now, as you can see,
so let's both be ASSOCIATIVE and FREE;
and, by COROLLARY, this shows you and I to be
PURELY INSEPERABLE, Q. E. D.
(QED = quod erat demonstratum, or "which was to be proven," a phrase that Euclid used to signify the end of a proof, and is still in common use today)
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment