(no subject)
When we kill civilians we shouldn't call it "collateral damage."
When they kill civilians we call it terrorism. But we drop bombs
on Iraq, and more than 6000 Iraqi civilians are slaughtered. We then
apoligize for the "spillover." Al Qaeda bombs the World Trade Center
and the Pentagon, 3000 are slaughtered, and it's terrorism. But what right did
we have to drop bombs on Iraq's civilain population? Were those civilians
threatening any of our lives?
When they kill civilians we call it terrorism. But we drop bombs
on Iraq, and more than 6000 Iraqi civilians are slaughtered. We then
apoligize for the "spillover." Al Qaeda bombs the World Trade Center
and the Pentagon, 3000 are slaughtered, and it's terrorism. But what right did
we have to drop bombs on Iraq's civilain population? Were those civilians
threatening any of our lives?